Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> __/ [ Tim Smith ] on Friday 05 January 2007 19:59 \__
>
> > On 2007-01-04, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >>> If you look at rodtrent's Digg submissions, you'll see that only a few
> >>> are favouring Microsoft, and there are also many that are unfavorable to
> >>> Microsoft, and the vast majority are so completely unrelated to
> >>> computers that they can't be said to be favorable or unfavorable to
> >>> Microsoft. Roy completely lied about rodtrent's Digg submissions.
> >>
> >> I never looked at his entire submissions 'profile' at all, but I know what
> >> I see when I go through the technology section and subsections. I also
> >
> > After you original claim, you narrowed it to the technology section, and
> > said you'd seen one of these alleged FUD submissions just recently. An
> > examination of the last couple of weeks of his submissions in that
> > section showed you were wrong about that, too.
> >
> > First your claim was 2800+ FUD from him. Then it was his comments.
> > Then it was his technology posts. Then it was you'd seen one recently.
> > ALL of these turned out to be false.
>
> Beyond the techology section, Digg is virtually invisible (non-existent) to
> me. I never looked at the guy's submissions as a whole. COLA trolls always
> seem to go beyond my shallower observations and tell me facts I do not know.
> I made the observation based on the knowledge that, whenever his name shows
> up, it's likely to be something about Windows. In the past week I also found
> that he submitted quite a few links to his own Web site (a Windows forum,
> I'd imagine).
Yet you commented as if you knew what you were talking about.
> If you think that I delibrately lied, forget about it.
Bending the truth doesn't seem to be a moral issue for you.
> I still stand by my initial propsotion that Trent,
> much like LQ who is a Microsoft shareholder,
So now you LIE again. I am not a Microsoft shareholder. And there is no
possibly way you could ever know if I was or wasn't a shareholder but
that doesn't stop you from lying does it?
> is coming to sites and forums supporting what keeps his waller full. I tried
> to speak to him about it, but he keeps escaping this. Never did he even try
> to defend himself. Ever.
> Not even LQ whose interest lies in the demise of Linux.
Another LIE from Roy Schestowitz. Do explain how my interest lies in
the demise of Linux.
> He's a former Microsoft employee,
Yes. I worked there from 1996 to 1998 when they acquired a former
company about a decade ago.
> Microsoft gave him enough money to get an early retirement and _GET THIS_:
Microsoft didn't "give me" anything. Hint for you... multi-Billion
dollar companies don't go around giving away money or retirement
packages.
> He is STILL a Microsoft shareholder.
Bullshit. You're a total LIAR Roy Schestowitz. I challenge you to prove
this. You can't. But that doesn't stop you from being a LIAR.
> That on par with having a Microsoft
> employee on COLA. He's a Munchkin, whether he is paid directly or not.
> Nobody in this newsgroup works for Red Hat or Novell.
How could you possibly know this?
> Only Microsoft is criminal enough to continue
> that practices which helped it abolish OS/2.
How is it "criminal" to post to a newgroup?
|
|
