Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Still looking for all the FUD...

  • Subject: Re: Still looking for all the FUD...
  • From: "Larry Qualig" <lqualig@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: 6 Jan 2007 06:48:47 -0800
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@google.com
  • In-reply-to: <12ptbgmlr277f80@news.supernews.com>
  • Injection-info: i15g2000cwa.googlegroups.com; posting-host=64.130.224.20; posting-account=I0FyeA0AAABAUAjJ9vi7laKRssUBoQA3
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <reply_in_group-5FED66.20501901012007@news.supernews.com> <Xns98ACEB92BD382hpt@194.177.96.26> <1167835619.612904.90460@n51g2000cwc.googlegroups.com> <engvt5$ifv$1@aioe.org> <12pobomfrpr3c85@news.supernews.com> <3910939.CvNkQXaqe4@schestowitz.com> <12ptbgmlr277f80@news.supernews.com>
  • User-agent: G2/1.0
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:477069
Tim Smith wrote:
> On 2007-01-04, Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> >> If you look at rodtrent's Digg submissions, you'll see that only a few
> >> are favouring Microsoft, and there are also many that are unfavorable to
> >> Microsoft, and the vast majority are so completely unrelated to
> >> computers that they can't be said to be favorable or unfavorable to
> >> Microsoft.  Roy completely lied about rodtrent's Digg submissions.
> >
> > I never looked at his entire submissions 'profile' at all, but I know what I
> > see when I go through the technology section and subsections. I also
>
> After you original claim, you narrowed it to the technology section, and
> said you'd seen one of these alleged FUD submissions just recently.  An
> examination of the last couple of weeks of his submissions in that
> section showed you were wrong about that, too.
>
> First your claim was 2800+ FUD from him.  Then it was his comments.
> Then it was his technology posts.  Then it was you'd seen one recently.
> ALL of these turned out to be false.


After literally telling lie, upon lie, upon lie there are no more lies
for Roy Schestowitz to tell anymore. He tried desperately to lie his
way out of this one but his words (lies) and the facts are plain for
all to see.

I'll take Roy's silence and refusal to respond to your post as an
admission of guilt. I'm also quite sure that Roy hasn't learned a thing
from this and will continue posting lies.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index