On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 16:02:29 -0700, Snit wrote:
> "flatfish+++" <flatfish@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
> rIcrh.133$975.106@xxxxxxxxxxxx on 1/16/07 3:54 PM:
>
>> On Tue, 16 Jan 2007 22:24:41 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>
>>> __/ [ Snit ] on Tuesday 16 January 2007 21:42 \__
>>>
>>>> "7" <website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
>>>> ywbrh.32022$k74.1724@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 1/16/07 2:33 PM:
>>>>
>>>>> asstroturfer Snit wrote on behalf of appil corporation:
>>>>>
>>>>>> "Roy Schestowitz" <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> stated in post
>>>>>> 1705611.ROHkPGCQRd@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx on 1/16/07 2:04 PM:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> New Gnome Control Center for Ubuntu?s Feisty Fawn & Gnome 2.17
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>>>> | One of the more noteworthy changes that users you will likely see
>>>>>>> | in the next release of Ubuntu's Feisty Fawn and in Gnome 2.18, will
>>>>>>> | be a new Gnome Control Center. The concept of having a central
>>>>>>> | control center to manage user preference?s and system administration
>>>>>>> | tasks is not new.
>>>>>>> `----
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://lunapark6.com/?p=2728
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Good to hear... actually sorta amazing that it took this long to get
>>>>>> something like this. The organization seems fairly Windows like and the
>>>>>> search is rather Mac like... but still good to see Ubuntu get something
>>>>>> like this.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Snot dude, Maks suck, so does windopz, just buy a PC, install GNU/Linux
>>>>> and be done with it.
>>>>>
>>>> In what way do you think GNU/Linux would work better for me than the Mac I
>>>> use now?
>>>
>>> The one thing to remember is that Apple enslaves what it perceives as
>>> "customer". There is no "user" per se. Data is stored in proprietary
>>> formats; the customer becomes accustomed to or dependent on something that's
>>> commercial (e.g. Finder), which makes exit barriers high(er). As/if the cost
>>> of the product rises, the customer must accept and comply.
>>>
>>> A decentralised approach to development gives you software that you control;
>>> not software that controls /you/ (and your wallet). You never know how
>>> things evolve... DRM-wise... restrictions-wide... in litigious terms...
>>> availability (who will maintain the code _if_ Apple reached bankruptcy in 10
>>> years?)... the list goes on...
>>>
>>> Do you /own/ your O/S. Or are you just licensed to use somebody else's? Take
>>> the test drive. The car is yours.
>>
>>
>> IMHO You, Roy Schestowitz are a complete paranoid nutcase..............
>>
>> Get thee to a mental health professional before you go off the deep end.
>>
> His hardware is not from an open source initiative... so I suppose he feels
> enslaved to it. Bizarre.
Yea, he is really starting to appear paranoid.
It must be a side effect to spending 24/7 posting messages to various
groups.
Hopefully he doesn't end up breaking down totally like this guy did:
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/bc64c6e578019d77
"The FAQ and Primer for COLA will no longer be published. I do not want
my family endangered, so the document is being withdrawn the project is
being canceled and my other pro-Linux projects and efforts are also being
canceled. "
He was another totally obsessed with Linux poster in COLA.
He finally snapped and flamed out.......
BTW that guy was the person who claimed to have proof that I am Gary
Stewart!
Maybe when he gets out of the loony bin we can ask him for that proof.
|
|
