begin oe_protect.scr
Dr. GroundAxe <groundaxe@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> wjbell wrote:
>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>> Visual comparison of major OS?s font rendering
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | Personally I don't like ClearType at all. And looking at it
>>> | gives me headaches. Also, Linux's myth of bad font rendering
>>> | is finally over.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://mywheel.net/blog/index.php/2007/01/08/visual-comparison-of-major-oss-font-rendering/
>>>
>>> Subject line quote from:
>>>
>>> http://digg.com/software/Visual_comparison_of_Mac_OS_X_Linux_and_Windows_font_rendering
>>
>> The fonts are still hideous in Linux. I admit clear type sucks. But
>> the windows fonts with no clear type are totally sharper than the Ubuntu
>> fonts. The Ubuntu fonts are globed up in corners and places are
>> bleeding together.
>>
>> If that's the level standards linux users have no wonder it's horrid.
>>
> Cleartype is excellent, and the version in Vista is even better. Anyone
> who knows anything about computer typography will tell you cleartype is
> superior to anything else out there. Linux font rendering is a joke.
I presume that you use an open-source News client because, in spite of
your protestations, you know very well that open-source software is
superior.
--
| Mark Kent -- mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
The state of innocence contains the germs of all future sin.
-- Alexandre Arnoux, "Etudes et caprices"
|
|
