Roy Schestowitz wrote:
> Watch how the convicted monopoly spread the FUD on Linux, trying to argue
> that open source is anti interoperability.
>
> About Microsoft interoperability
>
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | [Microsoft FUDmesiters:] "Is open source software better at achieving
> | interoperability than proprietary software?
> | Not necessarily. In certain cases the opposite could be true."
> `----
>
> http://www.thestatesman.net
page.news.php?clid=24&theme=&usrsess=1&id=161056
Micoshaft is a mixed bag of nuts thats going out of business.
About 3 years before they are clobbered for good.
In the mean time, they are liable to do many stupid things
like resorting to fantasy claims
with the eventual view to take with them as many users as they
can when the go down.
Because source code is available under Linux, Linux is
far more interoperable than anything micoshaft can hope to
achieve. It has also the biggest driver database on the planet
to talk to more hardware than any other OSes.
That also means Linux can connect with more devices and share
data. This shared data can be reformatted to different
views at the source code level with your applications.
That can't be done under windope OS.
So Linux is more interoperable than windopz by a million miles.
Item by item, the iteroperability list is bigger for Linux than it is
for the windummy OS.
|
|
