Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] [Linux] No ZFS Needed for Linux, New Filesystems May Obviate the Need

Jerry McBride <mcbrides9@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>
>> Kernel space: two new filesystems for Linux
>> 
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | New filesystem technology for Linux includes high capacity,
>> | snapshots, copy-on-write, and on-the-fly corruption detection.
>> `----
>> 
>> http://apcmag.com/6468/zfs_the_ultimate_filesystem
>> 
>
> Roy,
>
> ZFS is a proprietary file system OWNED by SUN. It is not licensed under the
> GPL and therefore is not a good thing to run on Linux.

Indeed. However Roy also supports Homer's stats - which are, of course,
closed source.

Mark Kent would refer to ZFS as "malware" since it's not OSS. Don't
believe me? Well google up his comments on closed source binary video
drivers. Conversely, however he revels in being just behind (oo-err)
Roy's backside in the "quality posts" section of the CLOSED SOURCE news
stats.

"Hypocrite" is a well known word in this group.

> Please, stop advocating ZFS. At least until SUN comes to their senses and
> releases the ZFS source under the GPL.

Especially if poor old Bearitall has to travel 4 hours because of a
disk error. LOL.

-- 
What's this script do?
    unzip ; touch ; finger ; mount ; gasp ; yes ; umount ; sleep
Hint for the answer: not everything is computer-oriented.  Sometimes you're
in a sleeping bag, camping out with your girlfriend.
		-- Contributed by Frans van der Zande

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index