Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows

  • Subject: Re: [News] Fedora vs. Ubuntu (Benchmark) and UNIX vs. Windows
  • From: Hadron Quark <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 08 Mar 2007 10:36:09 +0100
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:zPjZcIBLWN0tnlKsKUeefu5pHm4=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <6268036.Fpjf4NOynM@schestowitz.com> <odNHh.5441$Yy1.4752@textfe.usenetserver.com>
  • User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:502468
yttrx@xxxxxxxxx (yttrx) writes:

> Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Fedora v. Ubuntu: A Performance Look
>> 
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | In this article we have enclosed benchmarks from Fedora Core 6,
>> | Ubuntu 6.10 Edgy Eft, Fedora 7 Test 2, and Ubuntu Feisty Fawn Herd
>> | 5. In gaming and desktop benchmarks, which of these Linux
>> | distributions is faster? We hope to answer that question today.
>> `----
>> 
>> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=article&item=658&num=1
>>
>
> What a stupid fucking comparison.  The performance differential 
> between the linuces they tested are well within absolutely standard
> error allowance---which means that they mean exactly nothing at all.
>
> In layman's terms---they tested the same operating system four 
> times.  Real brainiacs there.
>

The mind boggles. These guys really are nuts.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index