Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [Roy Schestowitz Lies Again] Microsoft Acknowledges UAC is a Failure

  • Subject: Re: [Roy Schestowitz Lies Again] Microsoft Acknowledges UAC is a Failure
  • From: Jamie Hart <usenet@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 01 Mar 2007 13:03:16 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <2067823.tkZ3nkjG2l@schestowitz.com> <1513d4zt278sq$.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <erl0mc$hlg$02$1@news.t-online.com> <zo05pr55rm8b.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <r1o2b4-a7e.ln1@news.smilfinken.net> <rtd9onv5f3kb.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <ckt2b4-ssf.ln1@news.smilfinken.net> <awgdy7uhtv2f.dlg@funkenbusch.com> <0ifib4-avl.ln1@news.smilfinken.net> <874pp5mif5.fsf@gmail.com> <a2nib4-qjq.ln1@news.smilfinken.net> <87fy8pywrp.fsf@gmail.com>
  • User-agent: Xnews/2006.08.24
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:499523
Hadron Quark <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in 
news:87fy8pywrp.fsf@xxxxxxxxx:

> Johan Lindquist <spam@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
> 
>> So anyway, it was like, 10:17 CET Mar 01 2007, you know? Oh, and, yeah,
>> Hadron Quark was all like, "Dude,
>>>
>>> Those who live by the sword. Roy is a spammer and, frequently, a
>>> liar. Whether he lies on purpose or because he simply gets too
>>> carried away is generally unknown. But his continual pathetic
>>> attempts to discredit MS is, frankly, trying. It is hardly
>>> surprising that some people like to redress the balance.
>>
>> I (once again) realise you're just trolling now, since noone can be so
>> blatantly unaware of their own hypocrisy. Twice in one thread, too.
> 
> Example of me lying please?
> 
You called Roy a spammer. Nothing he posts fits the description of spam, so 
he's not a spammer. Therefore you lied.


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index