Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 Has Serious Bugs

  • Subject: Re: [News] Microsoft Virtual PC 2007 Has Serious Bugs
  • From: Kelsey Bjarnason <kbjarnason@xxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 13 Mar 2007 19:31:06 -0700
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Posted via Supernews, http://www.supernews.com
  • References: <1497189.C61oST0zCj@schestowitz.com>
  • User-agent: pan 0.120 (Plate of Shrimp)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:504600
[snips]

On Sat, 10 Mar 2007 01:43:27 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:


> ,----[ Quote ]
> | The restrictions on virtualization were discussed here a couple of 
> | months ago, but now the more people are waking up to the EULA restrictions.
> | 
> | MS claims it is "necessary for security reasons" and that only the "most 
> | technically savvy users, or people in companies with tech support, 
> | probably could handle Vista in virtualization programs, while home users 
> | should be steered away."
> `----
> 
> http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070222/ap_on_hi_te/microsoft_virtual_vista_2
> 
> 
> A Software Maker Goes Up Against Microsoft
> 
> ,----[ Quote ]
> | When quizzed on Microsoft's plans, Mr. Ballmer replied, "Our view is
> | that virtualization is something that should be built into the
> | operating system."


Built in, but as noted above, crippled beyond all repair.  MS's finest at
it again.


-- 
Do not contact me at kbjarnason@xxxxxxxxxxx

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index