Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: MS Fascistic, Orwellian -- Linux Democratic, Free

  • Subject: Re: MS Fascistic, Orwellian -- Linux Democratic, Free
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 12 Mar 2007 03:40:28 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: schestowitz.com / Netscape
  • References: <MPG.205e6299ce54d4f98969a@news.lafn.org> <QL-dnV4XA9pXWWnYnZ2dnUVZ_g6dnZ2d@comcast.com>
  • Reply-to: newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
__/ [ Paul Bramscher ] on Monday 12 March 2007 03:11 \__

> flyer wrote:
>> Sounds extreme at first, but...
>> 
>> 
>> MS Windows the (Orwellian, Brave New World OS):
>> 
>> -Spy code in every box (camera in every room).
>> 
>> -Obey or be shut down (obey or die).
>> 
>> -Hole ridden, severely multi-level patched inferior code (living
>> standards approaching fleas in dirt).
>> 
>> -Dark, hidden source code (truth buried under layers of lies).
>> 
>> -PR (lies) bought with money (public reality bought with propaganda adn
>> threats).
>> 
>> -Bill invests in 7-8 BIG PHARMA companies (everyone on drugs).
>> 
>> -Evidence shredded, buried, altered (history altered to fit).
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> Linux:
>> 
>> -Open to inspection.
>> 
>> -Free
>> 
>> -Good PR bought with freedom, choice, quality, performance, excellence.
>> 
> 
> Not extreme at all -- many of us see that analogy.  Further, I've begun
> to wonder about historical vs. modern fascisms.  Imagine if fascism
> didn't have a symbol or uniform -- but everything else.  What would it
> look like?  This is a strictly economic version -- they've been able to
> stomp out resistance in the economic sector by moving a new Big Box into
> an area and raising rent or property values such that the mom&pop's must
> necessarily go under.
> 
> With operating systems, most likely they're gambling on being able
> exploit some analogous dynamic.
> 
> I had my first opportunity to actually play with Vista today.  I found
> it to be virtually identical to XP in functionality, but the screen
> effects resembled a Fox News "swoosh".  Sort of an epileptic thing.
> Once I disabled that whiz-bang irritation, I imagine I'd roughly be back
> at XP (but a slower and more expensive version of it).

Have you seen it reduced to classic mode? It looks like Windows 98, which is
the last version of Windows that I used. Even gadgets look like a misfit.
Windows 98 at least has the merits of running more software and probably
supporting more hardware, but that's just the nightmare that lies underneath
the bonnet.

-- 
                ~~ Best wishes 

Roy S. Schestowitz  
http://Schestowitz.com  |  GNU is Not UNIX  |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
roy      pts/8                         Mon Mar 12 02:46   still logged in   
      http://iuron.com - proposing a non-profit search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index