Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [Linux] Suspend to RAM and Disk in Linux Discussed

  • Subject: Re: [Linux] Suspend to RAM and Disk in Linux Discussed
  • From: Hadron Quark <hadronquark@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 27 May 2007 09:57:54 +0200
  • Cancel-lock: sha1:rIf8VUN/YSbVbQdFsxDUPhirFTI=
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • References: <22728436.jZzQOWAaaT@schestowitz.com> <1180240811.443925.231610@n15g2000prd.googlegroups.com>
  • User-agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:528444
Tom Shelton <tom_shelton@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes:

> On May 26, 9:00 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> wrote:
>> Linux: Rethinking Suspend and Resume
>>
>> ,----[ Quote ]
>> | What started as the review of a bug report grew into an interesting
>> | debate as Linus Torvalds slammed the current suspend and resume design
>> | in the Linux Kernel...
>> `----
>>
>> http://kerneltrap.org/node/8267
>>
>> Why is Linus always so furious?
>
> He's a developer...  Developers tend to be short tempered and
> crotchety.  Just ask my family :)

Peter Koehlmann should get involved and tell Linus that he's a retard
and that it "all works you windoze windiot retard". While he's at it
maybe he and Kelsey could explain why "swap file" is inappropriate.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index