[H]omer wrote:
> Verily I say unto thee, that Matt spake thusly:
>> Peter Köhlmann wrote:
>>> Matt wrote:
>>>> [H]omer wrote:
>>>>> Verily I say unto thee, that Matt spake thusly:
>
>>>>>> Okay, but why not simply cut and paste the article's original
>>>>>> title: "MIT releases the sources of MULTICS, the father of
>>>>>> UNIX!" ?
>>>>> Why does it matter?
>>>>
>>>> Well now haven't you asked a foolish question?
>>>
>>> I can't see anything "foolish" there. *Why* does it matter?
>>
>> The subject line of a Usenet post matters not in the least to anyone
>> who:
>>
>> 1) reads every article, or 2) reads no article, or 3) reads articles
>> at random.
>>
>> I think you are a smart man. Maybe you could fill in the rest of the
>> answer.
>
> How about you just tell us, since you are obviously so sure of the
> answer? After all, you are the one who raised the objection. Why not
> just explain that objection in detail, assuming you can?
>
> So why *do* you have a problem with a subject line citing a product
> description in lieu of its name?
>
> Be sure to let us know when you've formulated a lucid answer.
>
> Or do you intend just repeating the this inane "you should know"
> response forever?
>
I guess he will. Feels smarter then
--
"SCSI is *NOT* magic. There are *fundamental technical reasons*
why it is necessary to sacrifice a young goat to your SCSI chain now and
then."
|
|
