Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] [Rival] Microsoft's OOXML Corruptions Are Back!!!

____/ [H]omer on Thursday 22 November 2007 20:07 : \____

> Verily I say unto thee, that Peter Köhlmann spake thusly:
>> Erik Funkenbusch wrote:
>>> You do realize that Sun or IBM were often the head of delegation in
>>> many countries for ODF, right?
>> Did they bribe too?
> No, after all why would they? ODF is an /Open/ format, used primarily in
> Free Software. Those promoting such a standard would have little to gain
> financially from bribery. Even Lotus Symphony is free, and StarOffice is
> little more than OpenOffice with a collection of templates and clip-art.
> The sheer number of ODF adopters [1] (in application development), means
> it would be rather difficult to accuse any /single/ company of trying to
> create some kind of format lock-in.
> Microsoft, and their probably-MSO-dependant® Not-Really-Open® Oh-Oh-XML®
> on the other hand ...
> Erik and other Microsoft apologists might as well face the fact, that MS
> have been abusing document formats, and other "standards", as a means of
> tying customers to their products for so long, that they are now totally
> incapable of producing a truly Open standard. It's just not their nature
> to do so. How will they lock customers in to their cash-cow without some
> proprietary format, ensuring that MSO is a "requirement"? How indeed :)

Even the horse has spoken.

Halloween Memo I Confirmed and Microsoft's History on Standards

,----[ Quote ]
|  By the way, if you are by any chance trying to figure out Microsoft's policy 
|  toward standards, particularly in the context of ODF-EOXML, that same 
|  Microsoft page is revelatory, Microsoft's answer to what the memo meant when 
|  it said that Microsoft could extend standard protocols so as to deny 
|  Linux "entry into the market":    
|    Q: The first document talked about extending standard protocols as a way 
|    to "deny OSS projects entry into the market." What does this mean? 
|    A: To better serve customers, Microsoft needs to innovate above standard 
|    protocols. By innovating above the base protocol, we are able to deliver 
|    advanced functionality to users. An example of this is adding 
|    transactional support for DTC over HTTP. This would be a value-add and 
|    would in no way break the standard or undermine the concept of standards, 
|    of which Microsoft is a significant supporter. Yet it would allow us to 
|    solve a class of problems in value chain integration for our Web-based 
|    customers that are not solved by any public standard today. Microsoft 
|    recognizes that customers are not served by implementations that are 
|    different without adding value; we therefore support standards as the 
|    foundation on which further innovation can be based.          


,----[ Quote ]
| [Microsoft:] ...we should take the lead in establishing a common
| approach to UI and to interoperability (of which OLE is only a part). Our
| efforts to date are focussed too much on our own apps, and only incidentally
| on the rest of the industry. We want to own these standards, so we should
| not participate in standards groups. Rather, we should call 'to me' to the
| industry and set a standard that works now and is for everyone's
| benefit. We are large enough that this can work.


> [1] http://opendocumentfellowship.com/applications

                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      | Othello for Win32/Linux: http://othellomaster.com
http://Schestowitz.com  |     GNU/Linux     |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Mem:    515500k total,   470052k used,    45448k free,     3868k buffers
      http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index