Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] New Milestones for ODF, OOXML is Apprently Struggling (as a Standardisation Contender)

  • Subject: [News] New Milestones for ODF, OOXML is Apprently Struggling (as a Standardisation Contender)
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 17 Oct 2007 01:12:20 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Topic : ODF (Open Document Format)

,----[ Quote ]
| I cannot find the link right now, but someone said that ODF was supported in 
| early versions of TextEdit for Leopard, but that it later was removed. As the 
| link you refer to is from 2006, I would not expect too much.  
| 
| [...]
| 
| New Leopard innovations:
| 
| http://www.apple.com/macosx/features/300.html#textedit
| 
| ODF / OpenDocument is Listed here. 
`----

http://discussions.apple.com/thread.jspa?messageID=5575555

CDF: Disrupting the Disruption

,----[ Quote ]
| It may be news to some -- not to the ODF Community, certainly -- that we at 
| the OpenDocument Foundation have been displeased with the direction of ODF 
| development this year. We find that ODF is not the open format with the open 
| process we thought it was or originally intended it to be.   
`----

http://fussnotes.typepad.com/plexnex/2007/10/cdf-disrupting-.html

Thanks, [H]omer. Just for completeness....

OOXML Payback Time as Global Standards Work in SC 34 "Grinds to a Halt"

,----[ Quote ]
| But unfortunately, the damage has not stopped there: since the OOXML ballot 
| closed on September 2, not a single ballot has received enough votes to count 
| in this important committee. Why? Because the last minute arrivals to SC 34 
| are not bothering to vote.   
`----

http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20071016092352827


Related:

Corrupt countries were more likely to support the OOXML document format

,----[ Quote ]
| Is this just a random coincidence? The median of the CPI index of the above 
| mentioned 70 countries is 3.95. Of the most corrupted half (CPI index less 
| than 3.95) 23 or 77% voted for approval (approval or approval with comments) 
| and 7 or 23% for disapproval; 5 abstained. Of the least corrupted half (CPI 
| index more than 3.95) 13 or 54% voted for approval and 11 or 46% voted for 
| disapproval; 11 abstained - see the table below.      
`----

http://www.effi.org/blog/kai-2007-09-05.en.html


Microsoft accused of more OOXML standards fiddling 

,----[ Quote ]
| However the 11 new countries are refusing to say how they will vote. These 
| include Cote d'Ivoire, Cyprus, Ecuador, Jamaica, Lebanon, Malta, Pakistan, 
| Trinidad and Tobago, Turkey, Uruguay and Venezuela. Most people seem to think 
| that these have been put there by Vole to make sure the standard gets pushed 
| through.    
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=42106


The OOXML Odyssey: Reader Outrage Edition

,----[ Quote
| What does it say about Microsoft and its current OOXML push that our 
| readers -- essentially, the home field for Microsoft in this contest -- are 
| so clearly opposed to the Redmond-sponsored technology?  
`----

http://reddevnews.com/blogs/weblog.aspx?blog=1238#1

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index