amicus_curious wrote:
>
> "[H]omer" <spam@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:io2ns4-6k1.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>>
>>> Refund for me! PC World buckle to the pressure.
>>>
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | I went back today and received a refund straight away with no
>>> | messing at all.
>>> `----
>>>
>>> http://www.dreamstate.eu/home/20070924.html
>>
>> "It would have been nice to be told why the sudden change of heart. :P
>> I received no appology for the mix up or anything."
>>
>> A sudden U-turn after all that hostility. Hmm, I wonder why?
>>
>> Still, this is a bit of a hollow victory. If he hadn't been a GNU/Linux
>> user, PC World would simply have repaired the broken hinge. A refund
>> just seems like a two finger salute, especially with no apology.
>>
>> I find it incredible that PC World would rather lose a sale, than repair
>> a broken hinge, simple because the OS on the laptop is GNU/Linux. Such
>> bigotry is shocking.
>>
> On the facts cited, the fellow asked for a refund and got it. Where is
> the mystery?
The mystery lies here in the fact that you are obviously too inept to follow
a thread and what had happened in that case.
You are not a windows user by chance? That would explain quite a lot
--
Microsoft: The company that made email dangerous
And web browsing. And viewing pictures. And...
|
|
