____/ [H]omer on Tuesday 25 September 2007 11:18 : \____
> Verily I say unto thee, that Peter Köhlmann spake thusly:
>
>>
<http://groups.google.com/group/microsoft.public.excel/browse_thread/thread/2bcad1a1a4861879/2f8806d5400dfe22?hl=en#2f8806d5400dfe22>
>>
>> Now we need the special rule in OOXML to account for this Excel behaviour
>
> "STATUS
> Microsoft has confirmed this to be a problem in the Microsoft products
> listed at the beginning of this article. We are researching this problem
> ... "
>
> http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q161234
>
> Goes back as far as Excel 5.0.
>
> Maybe they could enlist the help of some 1st grade maths students.
>
> ROTFLMAO!!!
It's one among the many bugs, some of them are _by design_, e.g. getting the
function floor() wrong. As Rob Weir said, this can cost /lives/.
--
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Useless fact: 21978 x 4 = 21978 backwards
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Cpu(s): 26.6%us, 4.8%sy, 1.0%ni, 62.7%id, 4.3%wa, 0.3%hi, 0.2%si, 0.0%st
http://iuron.com - semantic engine to gather information
|
|
