Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] BSI to Expect Investigation for Corruption Over Microsoft's OOXML

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] BSI to Expect Investigation for Corruption Over Microsoft's OOXML
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2008 02:53:31 +0100
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
ISO puts OOXML announcement on ice

,----[ Quote ]
| The delay on making any official announcement suggests the ISO is taking a 
| cautious approach before telling Microsoft it can pop open the bubbly. 
| 
| Meanwhile, the Open Source Consortium (OSC) has bemoaned the British 
| Standards Institute’s (BSI) own apparent change of heart on OOXML. 
| 
| Last week the BSI adjusted its stance on Microsoft’s somewhat controversial 
| file format. 
| 
| OSC president Mark Taylor said: "Once the BSI finally own up to what they've 
| done, we will be lodging a formal complaint in the UK, as will many others.  
`----

http://www.channelregister.co.uk/2008/04/01/ooxml_iso_announcement_delayed/

Expect a 2nd Official Complaint -- Against UK's OOXML Vote

,----[ Quote ]
| Update 3: To help you understand what Taylor means that once BSI owns up to 
| what it has done, then there will be a complaint filed, here's an email that 
| a reader just sent me, a response to his request to understand why the UK 
| changed its vote at the last minute, which we have permission to publish:   
| 
|     ---- Original Message ------------
|     Subject: RE: no information re: dis 29500
|     From: "Lucy Fulton" [redacted email]
|     Date: Tue, April 1, 2008 12:34 pm
|     To: [redacted email]
| 
|     -----------------------------------
| 
|     Dear Mr Wright,
| 
|     Many thanks for your email.
| 
|     It is not BSI's policy to make public the details of how it votes on 
|     International Standards. BSI sent a delegation to the ballot resolution 
|     meeting which took place in Geneva in February 2008 and subsequently 
|     requested that its technical committee carry out a review of its position 
|     on ISO/IEC DIS 29500.    
| 
|     The technical committee did so, made a consensus decision and advised BSI 
|     on its vote. 
| 
|     This is the procedure with any international ballot.
| 
|     Best wishes,
| 
|     Lucy Fulton 
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080401133818372

Translation: "Stay out. We are above the law."


Related:

How many bricks for 67Bricks?

,----[ Quote ]
| Inigo Surguy, the 67 Bricks Chief Technologist, was appointed Principal UK 
| Expert in Microsoft’s Office Open XML (OOXML) document format by the British 
| Standards Institute technical committee responsible for British and 
| international XML standards.   
| 
| 67Bricks is part of the Microsoft Empower programme.
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-49516/how-many-bricks-for-67bricks


John Pugh, MP, Rides to the Rescue

,----[ Quote ]
| Dear Mr Low,
| 
| I am deeply concerned that some national bodies have considered approving 
| DIS29500 "in their national interest". 
| 
| It is not in the interest of the UK or any other country for DIS 29500 to be 
| published as an international standard in its present form as there are a 
| significant number of unresolved issues, including incompatible licensing 
| conditions, single vendor interest and control as well as those other   
| factors uncovered since the original comment period closed. There is also the 
| issue that is no current form of DIS 29500, as yet another exception to the  
| process was made regarding the presentation of the proposed changes. 
| 
| Issues raised by the BSI and others during the original 30 day objections 
| phase have also never been properly addressed, not least of which is the 
| unsuitability of such a large and complex specification of an unproven format 
| to the fast track process.   
| 
| Such a standard, if approved, would govern the manipulation of all future 
| documents and lock users into a single supplier environment. The OOXML 
| specification contains significant Intellectual Property Rights and other 
| traps which will:   
| 
| - Stifle competition
| 
| - Diminish innovation overall
| 
| - Severely restrict consumer choice
| 
| - Block Government choice
| 
| - Limit the ability of UK SMEs to innovate and compete 
`----

http://www.computerworlduk.com/community/blogs/index.cfm?entryid=654


The BSI Has Been Corrupted by Microsoft — Another Chink in ISO’s armor

,----[ Quote ]
| Britain will be essentially represented by a Microsoft Gold Certified 
| Partner, having rejected OOXML several months ago. This apparently comes 
| after a reappointment.  
`----

http://boycottnovell.com/2008/02/15/bsi-sends-microsoft-partner/

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index