Google's festering problem with the AGPL
,----[ Quote ]
| Well, no, Chris, AGPL is not "meaning something else altogether." It actually
| means precisely what the GPL was always intended to mean: Reciprocity. It is
| likely true that Google doesn't like that reciprocity requirement, but
| that's "something else altogether."
|
| What is the AGPL? It's the Affero General Public License, and finishes the
| job that GPLv3 was supposed to do: Broaden the definition of "distribution"
| enough to keep Web freeriders like Google, Digg, etc. from using open-source
| code without contributing back.
`----
http://www.cnet.com/8301-13505_1-9917947-16.html?part=rss&tag=feed&subj=TheOpenRoad
Recent:
Google pays for Affero ban
,----[ Quote ]
| The projects will join around 10 other AGPL-licensed efforts on SourceForge,
| compared to six on Google Code. Before the defections, Google had been
| discouraging other AGPL projects, saying Google Code does not support AGPL.
|
| The dispute between Google and developers who want to use AGPL - a version of
| GPLv3 tailored for use in software as a service - has rumbled on since last
| November, when AGPL was finalized.
`----
http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/04/11/google_bans_aero/
Google blocking AGPL in Google Code
,----[ Quote ]
| So, first AGPL was not good enough for Google because it was not
| OSI-approved. That limited its popularity... Now it is OSI-approved. Still,
| it is not popular enough to be accepted in the Google closed open source
| hosting site?
|
| And, by the way, why should people put their open source code in the hands of
| someone who likes open source only when it does good to its business (ehm,
| that could include me, but we are not talking about me, are we ;-) ?
|
| C'mon Chris, give developers the ability of using AGPL for their own projects
| in Google Code. Your fight for no proliferation of licenses is something I
| subscribe to, but AGPL is the license of the future, no matter if Google
| likes it or not. And I can guarantee you it will become even more popular if
| it is accepted in Google Code...
`----
http://www.funambol.com/blog/capo/2008/03/google-blocking-agpl-in-google-code.html
Related:
GPL author: Google must share code
,----[ Quote ]
| Companies like Google that build their business on software such as
| Linux have a moral imperative to contribute back to the free
| software community, a prominent open source advocate said Tuesday.
`----
http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2007/052307-gpl-author-google-must-share.html?fsrc=rss-linux-news
http://tinyurl.com/2x5dvf
Funambol Helps New AGPLv3 Open Source License Gain Formal OSI Approval
,----[ Quote ]
| March 13, 2008 - Funambol, the leading provider of Mobile 2.0 messaging
| software powered by open source, today announced that the AGPLv3 has received
| formal approval by the Open Source Initiative (OSI). Funambol led the process
| of the license's approval by the OSI after adopting AGPLv3 in November. It
| was the first company to adopt the license, which closes the "ASP loophole".
`----
http://www.linuxpr.com/releases/10466.html
Census started for enterprise open source use
,----[ Quote ]
| Intended as a pluggable architecture for organizations to provide their own
| fingerprint rules and identify open source packages, OSS Discovery is
| licensed under the new Affero GPLv3 (AGPLv3) for open source SaaS.
`----
http://blogs.the451group.com/opensource/2007/12/12/census-started-for-enterprise-open-source-use/
Funambol Is First Major Commercial OpenSource Company To Support AGPLv3
,----[ Quote ]
| Funambol, the leading provider of mobile 2.0 messaging software powered by
| open source, today announced it has adopted GNU AGPLv3. This makes Funambol
| the first major commercial open source software company to adopt the license
| that was just released by the Free Software Foundation. Funambol adopted
| AGPLv3 because the company views it as a major open source license of the
| future.
`----
http://www.earthtimes.org/articles/show/news_press_release,230442.shtml
|
|
