On Apr 27, 9:38 am, William Poaster <w...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:33:37 -0600, High Plains Thumper wrote:
> > Homer wrote:
>
> >> [Irrelevant X-Posting snipped]
> >>> Verily I say unto thee, that Borked Pseudo Mailed spake
> >> thusly:
>
> > [Irrelevant non-Linux advocacy content snipped]
>
> >> That address is 5 years out of date. My new address (for Usenet
> >> contact) is <use...@xxxxxxxxxx>.
>
> > Trolls are getting stupider every day. Whilst Googling, I found this
> > boneheaded answer from [H]adron:
>
> >http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/
>
> msg/00dd56c5a729a882?
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> >>http://www.faqs.org/faqs/usenet/signature-faq/
>
> >>> ,---- THE ABSOLUTE BASICS: Get thee to thy home directory and therein
> >>> edit thyself a file. Name it `.signature'. Remember that inews and
> >>> other news systems (the ones that make up the majority of the news
> >>> software on Usenet, actually) will cut off everything after the fourth
> >>> line, so it's good to stay below that limit.
> >> `----
>
> >> But yours: ,---- -- K.http://slated.org
>
> >>> .----
> >>>> 'When it comes to knowledge, "ownership" just doesn't make sense' ~
> >>>> Cory Doctorow, The Guardian.http://tinyurl.com/22bgx8
> >>> `----
>
> >>> Fedora release 8 (Werewolf) on sky, running kernel 2.6.23.8-63.fc8
> >>> 15:54:40 up 127 days, 12:30, 4 users, load average: 0.08, 0.09, 0.07
> >>> [[End of PGP Signed Part]]
> >> `----
>
> >> Kindly learnt to respect Usenet standards. No one is interested in your
> >> "up time".
>
> > This is an example of (along with others that describes the abuser):
>
> HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!
> <quote>
> Kindly learnt to respect Usenet standards.
> <unquote>
>
> That's rich coming from an idiotic troll like Quack!
>
>
>
>
>
> >http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
>
> > [quote]
> > 7.6 Trespasser Disinformation Tactics
>
> > [2.] Distract your opponent from the issues at hand by accusing your
> > opponents of being "petty", "pathetic", "childish" or any of a number of
> > other such terms.
>
> > 26. Attack typos and ignore the content of the message. Point out your
> > opponent's grammatical flaws and spelling errors. By doing this you can
> > concentrate on form while ignoring substance. This is a very handy
> > method to discredit your opponent and by extension his position, without
> > once again exposing your ignorance of the issues begin discussed in the
> > thread.
>
> > 33. Claim false Alignment. Remind Everyone that you are a long-time
> > Linux user and advocate. Of course it is not true, so you will be
> > accused of being what you really are. When that happens and you are
> > accused of working against Linux. Deny! Deny! Deny!
>
> > 45. Criticize Linux Advocates but ignore anti-Linux propagandist
> > transgressions. Always criticize the behavior of Linux Advocates, but,
> > ignore the same and even worse transgressions are being committed by
> > your fellow Trespassers. [/quote]
>
> > 127 days up time is very good considering it is a personal use system.
> > I shut down my Ubuntu desktop system daily, there's no need t support
> > more than 1 user at a time. There's no need to keep things up all night
> > to push patches, because Microsoft Systems Management Server 2003 is
> > incapable of "Wake on LAN" without 3rd party assistance. (Green
> > standard has been around for a while, like 1995?)
>
Your insistence on contributing nothing to this group is just as
amazing as Roy's insistence on trying to make a name for himself by
posting about Microsoft. You both should be admired and feared.
|
|
