In comp.os.linux.advocacy, thufir
<hawat.thufir@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote
on Thu, 14 Aug 2008 04:10:00 GMT
<seOok.2083$hx.1334@pd7urf3no>:
> On Wed, 13 Aug 2008 16:35:04 -0700, The Ghost In The Machine wrote:
>
>>> Why go Java? You can do it faster in Ruby on Rails. Less hassle
>>> too......
>
> because Java is more well known? At least it's cross platform.
So is C#, after a fashion, because of Mono. I won't say
it's better, especially with patent encumbrances. I do
like C#'s built-in SOAP support, though I can't say I
use either C# or SOAP that often.
>
>> Why not use C#? On Windows, that makes perfect sense.
>
> Yes :(
Assuming "Windows" and "perfect sense" belong in the same sentence
anyway.
>
>> Regrettably, I'm not familiar enough with Ruby (beyond knowing it's
>> similar to Smalltalk) to work with it.
>
>
> http://poignantguide.net/ruby/ should be right up your alley :)
>
Thanks. :-)
>
>
> -Thufir
--
#191, ewill3@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Useless C++ Programming Idea #23291:
void f(item *p) { if(p != 0) delete p; }
** Posted from http://www.teranews.com **
|
|