Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Google Ends Mozilla Licence Discrimination; Firefox Embraces Luganda

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Google Code reverses open-source license ban

,----[ Quote ]
| Google has undone an earlier ban on the Mozilla Public License, an option for 
| open-source projects hosted at its Google Code site. 
| 
| Ostensibly as part of an effort to discourage the proliferation of 
| open-source licenses, Google dropped support for the MPL earlier in August. 
| Now, though, the company reconsidered, restoring it and adding support for 
| the Eclipse Public License as well.    
`----

http://news.cnet.com/8301-1001_3-10028591-92.html

What about AGPL?

Firefox Luganda translation now available for download

,----[ Quote ]
| The translation was completed earlier this month by Makerere University's 
| Faculty of Computing and Information Technology (CIT) in collaboration with 
| Rhodes University, Mozilla Firefox and Translate.org.  
`----

http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/082808-firefox-luganda-translation-now-available.html?fsrc=rss-linux-news
http://tinyurl.com/5l49ep


Recent:

Google pays for Affero ban

,----[ Quote ]
| The projects will join around 10 other AGPL-licensed efforts on SourceForge,
| compared to six on Google Code. Before the defections, Google had been
| discouraging other AGPL projects, saying Google Code does not support AGPL.
|
| The dispute between Google and developers who want to use AGPL - a version of
| GPLv3 tailored for use in software as a service - has rumbled on since last
| November, when AGPL was finalized.
`----

http://www.regdeveloper.co.uk/2008/04/11/google_bans_aero/


Google blocking AGPL in Google Code

,----[ Quote ]
| So, first AGPL was not good enough for Google because it was not
| OSI-approved. That limited its popularity... Now it is OSI-approved. Still,
| it is not popular enough to be accepted in the Google closed open source
| hosting site?
|
| And, by the way, why should people put their open source code in the hands of
| someone who likes open source only when it does good to its business (ehm,
| that could include me, but we are not talking about me, are we ;-) ?
|
| C'mon Chris, give developers the ability of using AGPL for their own projects
| in Google Code. Your fight for no proliferation of licenses is something I
| subscribe to, but AGPL is the license of the future, no matter if Google
| likes it or not. And I can guarantee you it will become even more popular if
| it is accepted in Google Code...
`----

http://www.funambol.com/blog/capo/2008/03/google-blocking-agpl-in-google-code.html


AGPLv3 Keeps Open Source Vibrant in Age of SaaS

,----[ Quote ]
| For all practical purposes, the AGPLv3 is a key advance for everyone involved
| in open source, regardless of if you are a software developer, Internet end
| user or enterprise end user. The AGPLv3 closes the ASP loophole and keeps the
| freedom of open source software alive, in the age of SaaS and hosted
| applications.
`----

https://fossbazaar.org/?q=content/agplv3-keeps-open-source-vibrant-age-saas
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAki34dkACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5l7wCeNahE20UQAdJzERqrIS2LurvQ
zE0An1yVIyv68jazYmN55Lwyc0edcJi7
=+XMq
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index