Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] OOXML Another Internet Explorer-like Disaster Waiting to Happen

  • Subject: [News] OOXML Another Internet Explorer-like Disaster Waiting to Happen
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 04 Feb 2008 14:06:30 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Backwards compatibility lock-in

,----[ Quote
| Backwards compatibility of formats is a curse. An arcticle of Microsoft 
| Internet Explorer Platform architect Chris Wilson provided me with some 
| insights how the market locks in developers of the non-conformant practice.  
| 
| [...]
| 
| What does it mean for Office Open XML? No one can make sure that there will 
| ever be an implementation of OOXML that conforms to the DIS 29500 
| specification. When changes are made to the specification there is still no 
| guarantee that they would be applied in actual implementations. This is 
| especially of concern for a government user that would decide to adopt a 
| technically fully fixed ISO standard.     
`----

http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-39330/backwards-compatibility-lock-in


Related:

Opera CTO: 'We're punished' for following Web standards

,----[ Quote ]
| Microsoft Corp.'s refusal or inability to fully support three Web standards 
| has cost Opera Software ASA users, the Norwegian browser maker's chief 
| technology officer said today.  
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9053122&source=rss_news50
http://tinyurl.com/3xnqn2


Halloween Memo I Confirmed and Microsoft's History on Standards

,----[ Quote ]
|  By the way, if you are by any chance trying to figure out Microsoft's policy 
|  toward standards, particularly in the context of ODF-EOXML, that same 
|  Microsoft page is revelatory, Microsoft's answer to what the memo meant when 
|  it said that Microsoft could extend standard protocols so as to deny 
|  Linux "entry into the market":    
|
|    Q: The first document talked about extending standard protocols as a way 
|    to "deny OSS projects entry into the market." What does this mean? 
|
|    A: To better serve customers, Microsoft needs to innovate above standard 
|    protocols. By innovating above the base protocol, we are able to deliver 
|    advanced functionality to users. An example of this is adding 
|    transactional support for DTC over HTTP. This would be a value-add and 
|    would in no way break the standard or undermine the concept of standards, 
|    of which Microsoft is a significant supporter. Yet it would allow us to 
|    solve a class of problems in value chain integration for our Web-based 
|    customers that are not solved by any public standard today. Microsoft 
|    recognizes that customers are not served by implementations that are 
|    different without adding value; we therefore support standards as the 
|    foundation on which further innovation can be based.          
`----

http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20070127202224445 


ECIS Accuses Microsoft of Plotting HTML Hijack

,----[ Quote ]
| An industry coalition that has represented competitors of Microsoft
| in European markets before the European Commission stepped up its
| public relations offensive this morning, this time accusing
| Microsoft of scheming to upset HTML's place in the fabric of
| the Internet with XAML, an XML-based layout lexicon forn
| etwork applications.
`----

http://www.betanews.com/article/ECIS_Accuses_Microsoft_of_Plotting_HTML_Hijack/1169824569


Is Microsoft learning from Web standards mistakes?

,----[ Quote ]
| In a video interview with ZDNet Australia last month, Microsoft blogger and 
| group manager of technical community, Frank Arrigo, explained how important 
| it is for the Redmond giant to follow Web standards.  
| 
| "Standards are important," said Arrigo, who admitted that Microsoft had been 
|                                             ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| guilty of ignoring them in the past. "If you look at IE6, we didn't quite 
| ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
| follow all the standards but standards are important ... IE7 as an example is 
| trying to address that."   
`----

http://www.zdnet.com.au/news/software/soa/Is-Microsoft-learning-from-Web-standards-mistakes-/0,130061733,339280240,00.htm


,----[ Quote ]
| From:       Bill Gates
| Sent:       Saturday, December 05, 1998 9:44 AM
| To:         Bob Muglia (Exchange); Jon DeVaan; Steven Sinofsky
| Cc:         Paul Mariz
| Subject:    Office rendering
| 
| One thing we have got to change is our strategy -- allowing Office 
| documents to be rendered very well by OTHER PEOPLES BROWSERS is one of the 
| most destructive things we could do to the company.
| 
| We have to stop putting any effort into this and make sure that Office
| documents very well depends on PROPRIETARY IE capabilities.
| 
| Anything else is suicide for our platform. This is a case where Office has
| to  to destroy Windows.
`----

http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/2000/PX02991.pdf

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index