McAfee throws some FUD at the GPL
,----[ Quote ]
| In its annual report, Windows security software vendor McAfee told its
| investors that open source software licence terms it vaguely characterised
| as " ambiguous" might "result in unanticipated obligations regarding our
| products."
|
| [...]
|
| That statement says several things. First, it reveals that McAfee does use at
| least some open source software derived code in its products. Second, it
| betrays that McAfee has misappropriated that open source software and thus is
| committing copyright infringement, because it doesn't distribute that open
| source software derivative source code. Third, by calling its products that
| include open source software code "proprietary", McAfee shows that it really
| doesn't want to shoulder its GPL licence obligations, but instead wants to
| both have its cake and eat it too.
`----
http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/01/05/mcafee-throws-fud-gpl
They are afraid of Linux too they attacked it with FUD before. This appeared in
COLA around 2006. They have also been doing illegal things recently, other
than GPL violations as it seems.
Recent:
McAfee to pay $13.8 million to settle backdating lawsuits
,----[ Quote ]
| McAfee has taken two major steps toward closing the stock-option backdating
| scandal that has plagued the company for the past two years.
`----
http://news.yahoo.com/s/infoworld/20071222/tc_infoworld/94209
|
|
