Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [Roy Schestowitz gets it wrong again] Intel BUSTED Astroturfing Against OLPC/Linux, Spits and Fuels Anti-OLPC Slurs (was: [News] Intel BUSTED Astroturfing Against OLPC/Linux, Spits and Fuels Anti-OLPC Slurs)

  • Subject: Re: [Roy Schestowitz gets it wrong again] Intel BUSTED Astroturfing Against OLPC/Linux, Spits and Fuels Anti-OLPC Slurs (was: [News] Intel BUSTED Astroturfing Against OLPC/Linux, Spits and Fuels Anti-OLPC Slurs)
  • From: Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 13 Jan 2008 12:55:40 -0500
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: None
  • References: <1501870.8AVAQx3maK@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • User-agent: 40tude_Dialog/2.0.15.1
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:593388
Somehow I knew you'd jump on this, and make it worse with an even more
inflamatory headline.  See Below.

On Sun, 13 Jan 2008 03:33:46 +0000, Roy Schestowitz wrote:

> OLPC blog draws fire for failure to disclose
> 
> ,----[ Quote ]
>| The OLPC News website in the past months has build up a reputation for 
>| sharply criticizing the $100 laptop project headed up by Nicholas Negroponte. 
>| 
>| [...]
>| 
>| So it doesn't take too much of a conspiracy theorist to believe that Intel is 
>| secretly bankrolling the OLPC-News website. 
>| 
>| Adding insult to injury, OLPC-News is buying advertising on Google to attract 
>| visitors to its website.  
> `----
> 
> http://www.siliconvalleysleuth.com/2007/01/olpc_blog_draws.html
> 
> Just like Microsoft. This is criminal. Intel and Microsoft would make a nice
> pair in a prison cell (if only they were not above the law). 

If you'd actually bothered to do a little research yourself, you would have
found out that.  A) The person in question was never an Intel employee.  He
worked for a company called GeekCorps that was a buisiness partner of
Intels.  B) the article in question where this was revealed was over a year
old, and since that time the person in question quit GeekCorps.  C) Even
the ex-CTO of OLPC (who just left to start her own company, which you've
lauded) says He's not affiliated with Intel.  

See: 
http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=416106&cid=22017038

What's more, the person in question has actually been very positive about
OLPC, even though other authors on the site have had some negative
articles.

But hey, anything to drive your agenda, right Roy?  It's not like all this
wasn't known at least a *DAY* before you posted this.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index