Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] [Rival] Windows Server Can Be Own3D by Other Businesses ("Critical" Flaw)

  • Subject: [News] [Rival] Windows Server Can Be Own3D by Other Businesses ("Critical" Flaw)
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Sun, 27 Jan 2008 12:31:30 +0000
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Netscape / schestowitz.com
  • User-agent: KNode/0.10.4
Windows Small Business Server at risk from critical flaw

,----[ Quote
| Microsoft said Wednesday that another one of its operating system products is 
| vulnerable to a critical vulnerability, first patched two weeks ago. 
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9058759&source=rss_news10

Is hijacked of a server worse than data corruption (Windows Home Server)?
Microsoft still proves that it's bad for business.


Days ago:

Microsoft confirms Office for Mac 2008 snafu

,----[ Quote ]
| Office for Mac 2008 incorrectly assigns ownership of some files, Microsoft 
| Corp. has confirmed, creating a potential security problem for businesses 
| installing the new application suite.  
`----

http://www.computerworld.com/action/article.do?command=viewArticleBasic&articleId=9058840&source=rss_news10


Related:

Ten Common Security Myths

,----[ Quote ]
| While browsing and in discussion with friends, I have come across many 
| misconceptions regarding security. Some of them are planted by the marketing 
| division of software companies, some are the result of fanboyism and some are 
| due to plain ignorance. The following are some of the most common:  
| 
| Myths regarding the OS:
| 
|     * Windows is insecure because of its popularity...
| 
| [...]
`----

http://freewebsoftwarereviews.blogspot.com/2008/01/ten-common-security-myths.html


Critical Vulnerability in Microsoft Metrics

,----[ Quote ]
| This is a small subset of all the vulnerabilities, because the 
| vulnerabilities that are found through the QA process and the vulnerabilities 
| that are found by the security folks they engage as contractors to perform 
| penetration testing are fixed in service packs and major updates. For 
| Microsoft this makes sense because these fixes get the benefit of a full test 
| pass which is much more robust for a service pack or major release than it is 
| for a security update.      
`----

http://blog.mozilla.com/security/2007/11/30/critical-vulnerability-in-microsoft-metrics/


http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03096.pdf


Skeletons in Microsoft’s Patch Day closet

,----[ Quote ]
| This is the first time I’ve seen Microsoft prominently admit to silently 
| fixing vulnerabilities in its bulletins — a controversial practice that 
| effectively reduces the number of publicly documented bug fixes (for those 
| keeping count) and affects patch management/deployment decisions.   
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/security/?p=316


Beware of undisclosed Microsoft patches

,----[ Quote ]
| Forget for a moment whether Microsoft is throwing off patch counts 
| that Microsoft brass use to compare its security record with those 
| of its competitors. What do you think of Redmond’s silent patching 
| practice?
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/microsoft/?p=527


Microsoft is Counting Bugs Again

,----[ Quote ]
| Sorry, but Microsoft's self-evaluating security counting isn't really a 
| good accounting.
| 
| [...]
| 
| The point: Don't count on security flaw counting. The real flaw is 
| the counting.
`----

http://www.microsoft-watch.com/content/security/microsoft_is_counting_bugs_again.html?kc=MWRSS02129TX1K0000535


Microsoft is the world's biggest cause of zombie remailers

,----[ Quote ]
| In China, it would take about one and one-half years wages (for the
| average Chinese) to buy a legitimate copy of Windows Vista. If you
| could find it here.
| 
| Microsoft is the biggest cause of zombie remailers in the world,
| because they make noises, but do not do anything to address the
| real digital inequities in the world. 
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38202


Excuse me sir: there's a rootkit in your master boot record

,----[ Quote ]
| Every version of Windows, including Vista, is vulnerable to the rootkit.
`----

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/01/09/mbr_rootkit/


Linux vs. Windows: Which is Most Secure?

http://www.esecurityplanet.com/views/article.php/3665801


Linux Security: A Big Edge Over Windows

http://www.linuxinsider.com/rsstory/54742.html


The problems with Vista laid bare - What might have been

http://www.theinquirer.net/default.aspx?article=38419


Why Windows is less secure than Linux

http://blogs.zdnet.com/threatchaos/?p=311


Linux more secure than Windows, national survey shows

http://www.xomba.com/linux_more_secure_than_windows_national_survey_shows


Microsoft Windows: Insecure by Design

http://www.washingtonpost.com/ac2/wp-dyn/A34978-2003Aug23?language=printer


If Only We Knew Then What We Know Now About Windows XP

http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/09/23/AR2006092300510.html?nav=rss_technology


Why Windows is a security nightmare.

http://www.smh.com.au/articles/2004/05/21/1085120110704.html

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index