Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: [News] KWord Gets ODF Support, Abiword Eases Migration to GNU/Linux

Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
> 
> ____/ Sinister Midget on Saturday 28 June 2008 18:04 : \____
> 
>> On 2008-06-28, Erik Funkenbusch <erik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> claimed:
>>> On Sat, 28 Jun 2008 10:04:43 +0100, Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>
>>>> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>>>> Hash: SHA1
>>>> 
>>>> Getting started with KWord Development
>>>> 
>>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>>>| About 2 months ago, I started working on KWord ODF support. Getting
>>>>| productive working on KWord is no mean task - apart from the mandatory
>>>>| C++/Qt knowledge, one need to know Scribe, KDE, KOffice libs and KWord. I
>>>>| knew only C++/Qt and basic Scribe.
>>>> `----
>>>> 
>>>> http://blog.forwardbias.in/2008/06/getting-start-with-kword.html
>>>
>>> As usual, Roy distorts the truth.
>>>
>>> KWord has not "got" ODF Support, it's in the process of getting ODF
>>> support, very minimal ODF support at that (the author admits to ignore much
>>> of it).
>> 
>> Is there a difference between "get(s)" and "got" in Funkendroll? Do you
>> even know there /is/ a difference in normal-people languages?
> 
> The heckling gremlins will read things the way that serves their
> shoot-the-messenger strategy. They should criticise the article (if at all),
> not people.
> 

Gets, does get and is getting are all present tense in English.  

-- 
| mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk                           |
| Cola faq:  http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/   |
| Cola trolls:  http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/                        |
| Open platforms prevent vendor lock-in.  Own your Own services!       |


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index