Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Difference Between Proprietary Drivers and Proprietary Applications

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Matt Hartley Doesn't Understand Why We Need Open Graphics Drivers

,----[ Quote ]
| The reason is simple: Skype is an application. In general, the Linux 
| developers don't have a problem with closed-source applications for their 
| platform, as long as they don't have to use those applications. Think of 
| software as a tree structure: the kernel is the trunk of the tree, libraries 
| are branches, applications are leaves. Nothing depends on the leaves, not 
| even the other leaves. Remove Skype, and the system keeps working. Not so 
| with the nVidia driver. It's right in the middle of the main output path of 
| the entire system.        
`----

http://technocrat.net/d/2008/7/16/45937


Recent:

How NVidia impedes Free Desktop adoption.

,----[ Quote ]
| nvidia.ko: The NVidia driver is the single component in a KDE4 / Free
| Operating system stack causing us most of the hard-to-solve problems. In
| other words, nvidia.ko has grave technical shortcomings.
`----

http://vizzzion.org/?blogentry=819


Linux Kernel Developers Call for Open Source Drivers - Weakly

,----[ Quote ]
| I just wish that the kernel developers could lead with less equivocation.
`----

http://technocrat.net/d/2008/6/23/44265


Kernel space: drivers that don't make the kernel scene

,----[ Quote ]
| Linux supports most hardware "out of the box" without adding a driver. Most
| of the missing drivers are proprietary, from uncooperative manufacturers, but
| there are a few where the license is right but the actual code is still
| missing. Why?
`----

http://www.linuxworld.com/news/2008/062408-kernel.html?fsrc=rss-linux-news


Linux Foundation points finger at Nvidia

,----[ Quote ]
| Though a statement issued Monday does not cite Nvidia by name, Linux
| Foundation Technical Advisory Board Chair James Bottomley cited Nvidia in a
| phone interview. "My intent is to point out the problems Nvidia has been
| causing themselves with their binary-only (drivers)," he said. "They are
| certainly one of the few companies sticking to a binary-only strategy."
| Binary-only means the drivers are essentially closed.
`----

http://news.cnet.com/8301-10784_3-9975720-7.html?part=rss&subj=news&tag=2547-1_3-0-20


Position Statement on Linux Kernel Modules

https://www.linuxfoundation.org/en/Kernel_Driver_Statement


NVidia says no to request to release open source drivers, once again

,----[ Quote ]
| Nvidia reiterated that it won’t provide open source drivers for Linux because
| the company claims there is no need for it.
|
| Nvidia provides binary Linux drivers and has open sourced some drivers such
| as the nv X driver and other utilities that work with the proprietary driver,
| including the installer, config and settings.The company is a leading
| provider of graphics cards and software for the desktop and embraces a cross
| platform strategy.
`----

http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=2588


Nvidia "opens can of whoop-ass" on itself

,----[ Quote ]
| Nvidia is going to lose gobs and gobs of market share this year. They are
| effectively out of notebooks, will lose the high end in days, don't have
| anything close to a competitive line-up, have higher costs than ATI, and have
| to shell out money to keep partners alive. If you think this is bad, wait a
| little.
`----

http://www.theinquirer.net/gb/inquirer/news/2008/07/02/nvidia-opens-whoop-ass-itself


How Closed Does Nvid[i]a want to Be?

,----[ Quote ]
| Not so much staying closed, as closing down....
`----

http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2008/07/how-closed-does-nvida-want-to-be.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiARdgACgkQU4xAY3RXLo6kIgCcCLdL/8aTIxg30cGUK1huIekl
Z8wAn2nJ7qs/5M8ut5QzHS6lvqp73Oov
=HE4b
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index