Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Foxconn Reported to FTC for Sabotage Against Linux

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Foxconn deliberately sabotaging their BIOS to destroy Linux ACPI

,----[ Quote ]
| Complained to the Federal Trade Commission
| 
| http://www.ftc.gov
| 
| Foxconn
| 458 E. Lambert Road Fullerton
| Fullerton, CA
| 92835
| 
| FOXCONN PHONE NUMBER: 714-871-9968
| 
| Company sold me a computer motherboard, model G33M-S, claiming that it was 
| compliant with ACPI versions 1.0, 2.0, and 3.0. 
| 
| Linux and FreeBSD do not work with this motherboard due to it's ACPI 
| configuration, using a disassembler program, I have found that it detects 
| Linux specifically and points it to bad DSDT tables, thereby corrupting it's 
| hardware support, changing this and setting the system to override the BIOS 
| ACPI DSDT tables with a customized version that passes the Windows versions 
| to Linux gives Linux ACPI support stated on the box, I am complaining because 
| I feel this violates an anti-trust provision in the Microsoft settlement, I 
| further believe that Microsoft is giving Foxconn incentives to cripple their 
| motherboards if you try to boot to a non-Windows OS.        
| 
| We have received your complaint.
| 
| Thank you for contacting the FTC. Your complaint has been entered into 
| Consumer Sentinel, a secure online database available to thousands of civil 
| and criminal law enforcement agencies worldwide. Your reference number is:  
| 19642372
| 
| [...]
| 
| They detect Linux, give it a bad DSDT table, one that looks ok at a glance, 
| but broken in subtle ways so that some of it works, but not correctly. 
| 
| You call them to ask why their board won't run Linux.
| 
| They tell you to buy Vista.
| 
| They're basically rubbing Microsoft's back. 
`----

http://ubuntuforums.org/showthread.php?t=869249


Related:

,----[ Quote ]
| From: Bill Gates
| Sent: Sunday, January 24, 1999 8:41 AM
| To: Jeff Westorinen; Ben Fathi
| Cc: Carl Stork (Exchange); Nathan Myhrvold; Eric Rudder
| Subject: ACPI extensions
| 
| One thing I find myself wondering about is whether we shouldn't try
| and make the "ACPI" extensions...
| 
| It seems unfortunate if we do this work and get our partners to do the
| work and the results is that Linux...
| 
| Maybe there is no way to avoid this problem but it does bother me.
| 
| Maybe we could define the APIs so that they work well with NT and not
| the others even if they are open.
| 
| Or maybe we could patent something related to this.
`----

http://edge-op.org/iowa/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/px03020.pdf
http://antitrust.slated.org/www.iowaconsumercase.org/011607/3000/PX03020.pdf
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiKIpcACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4PBwCfU1zbPEXgy1evDqUkmzLm8IZJ
aMgAnRVAxeLfQb3WetcmTclMzOdMNV4J
=hYaW
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index