Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Economist Propagates Hollywood's Daemonisation Terms

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

The Egregious Economist

,----[ Quote ]
| I continue to be gobsmacked by the egregious stupidity of The Economist:
| 
|     Commercial piracy may not be as horrific as the seaborne version off the 
|     Horn of Africa.... But stealing other people’s R&D, artistic endeavour or 
|     even journalism is still theft.   
| 
| Not only is it not as horrific as what occurs off the Horn of Africa, it is a 
| total insult to parrot such a stupid, loaded metaphor, which consciously 
| tries to equate the two. And for the six billionth time, it's *not* theft, no 
| matter how many times you repeat it: it's infringement.   
| 
| Nothing is stolen: you still have your R&D, your artistic endeavour or even 
| your journalism.  
`----

http://opendotdotdot.blogspot.com/2008/07/egregious-economist.html


Recent:

A Czar for the Digital Peasants

,----[ Quote ]
| One sure sign of a lack of political vision is a rise in the number of pieces
| of acronymic legislation. After September 11, the US Congress passed the
| euphoniously named “Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing
| Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act” the
| initials of which spell out “USA – Patriot.” The Patriot Act is a pretty bad
| piece of legislation, but at least its drafters worked hard on the acronyms
| so that opponents could be labelled “anti-patriot” – a perfect level of
| analysis for Fox News. Admittedly, in this administration, having public
| officials torturing acronyms rather than detainees might be counted as a
| plus, but I still find the whole practice distasteful. I'd suggest that
| politicians vow to vote against any piece of legislation with its own
| normatively loaded acronym, no matter how otherwise appealing. It might make
| them focus a little more on the content.
|
| In any event, Congress has been at it again. The House just passed, and the
| Senate is considering, the Prioritizing Resources and Organization for
| Intellectual Property Act of 2008 – or “Pro-IP” Act. (If it passes, a version
| is sure to be urged on Europe as a matter of “harmonisation.”) Are you
| pro-intellectual property? Then surely you must be for this piece of
| legislation! The name says it all.
`----

http://www.ft.com/cms/s/0/14aacbc8-41e1-11dd-a5e8-0000779fd2ac.html
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkiHmf4ACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4ajQCfQ0bJ1cgOXVmH5tBqlq5jr8cY
tcgAn1KTrC38DK8v1iEVSRMoyU7SIDGn
=i1qc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index