Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Review of OpenOffice.org 3.0 (and Windows Vista Snubbed)

  • Subject: Re: Review of OpenOffice.org 3.0 (and Windows Vista Snubbed)
  • From: AqD <aquila.deus@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 2 Jun 2008 01:59:38 -0700 (PDT)
  • Bytes: 1609
  • Complaints-to: groups-abuse@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Injection-info: c19g2000prf.googlegroups.com; posting-host=220.139.77.70; posting-account=SvMarQoAAABb8Mg5dch245HBL0L9JsM4
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: http://groups.google.com
  • References: <2318134.RROGZAnpbq@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • User-agent: G2/1.0
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:647891
On Jun 2, 12:54 pm, Roy Schestowitz <newsgro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> First Look: OpenOffice.org 3.0 for Windows

Who care if it's OOo 2 or OOo 3?

People use OOo because they heard it's "FREE", and "COMPATIBLE" with M
$-Office. So basically it's just a free clone of M$ office to most
users. Any more feature is just useless because people wouldn't want
to learn it anyway.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index