Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

[News] Rave About GNOME Do, Ubuntu Multiple User Accounts

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

GNOME Do and The Network Backed Plugin Architecture

,----[ Quote ]
| So I like GNOME Do. That’s not exactly a secret. Nor am I the only one.
| 
| [...]
| 
| Anyhow, it is thus that I like Do personally for what it’s achieved, but 
| follow it professionally for what it represents: the ongoing conflation of 
| network and client. There’s a long way yet to travel, but we’re getting 
| closer to applications that treat the network as an assumption rather than an 
| afterthought, as the design and architectures increasingly reflect, both in 
| the open source world and out of it.     
`----

http://redmonk.com/sogrady/2008/06/23/network-plugin-architecture/

Inside Users and Accounts

,----[ Quote ]
| Linux allows multiple user accounts on the same installation. Here's how to 
| set up multiple accounts during Ubuntu installation. 
`----

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2320515,00.asp

In Windows, networking, security and multiple users are just an 'Ugly Hack'.
They ignored decades of UNIX lessons and it shows.


Related:

Did Microsoft just patent sudo?

,----[ Quote ]
| 1985, huh? And when did this Microsoft patent happen? It was filed in
| 2000. Well gee, that doesn't make sense. How'd they get the patent?
| It certainly falls under the category of "obvious" if there's prior
| art such as sudo.
| 
| What makes this whole thing funny, though, is something I saw a couple
| days ago. Head over to Builder-AU and listen to Peter Watson from
| Microsoft. He says,
| 
|   "User Account Control is a great idea and strategically
|   a direction that sort of all operating systems and all technology
|   should be heading down"
| 
| Excuse me? Does he really believe this is all Microsoft's great new
| idea?
| 
| In the end, this seems like a patent that Microsoft will hold up and
| say "we have a patent and Linux is violating it!" They won't ever
| sue on it though (just leave the threat hanging to scare away
| potential users), because then they could have the patent revoked.
| It's better for them to just wave it around.
`----

http://ubuntulinuxtipstricks.blogspot.com/2007/05/did-microsoft-just-patent-sudo.html


Microsoft Says Other OSes Should Imitate UAC

,----[ Quote ]
| The most controversial aspect of Watson's comments all center around
| the idea that Microsoft is a leader with UAC, and that other OSes
| should follow suit. UAC is a cousin of myriad "superuser" process
| elevation strategies, which Mac OS X and all flavors of Linux
| already enjoy. The fact is that Microsoft is late to the party
| with their Microsoftized version of sudo. That's really what UAC
| is, after all: sudo with a fancy display mechanism (to make it hard
| to spoof) and extra monitoring to pick up on "suspicious" behavior.
`----

http://arstechnica.com/news.ars/post/20070501-microsoft-uac-approach-is-so-good-other-oses-should-follow-suit.html
http://tinyurl.com/yw9ose
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFIYSplU4xAY3RXLo4RAvlCAJ0aUvlynXDLRX6/TskbwkwUiBIpRACeIe85
PKeShm72vP00i6xgNebkgsA=
=mdEo
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index