Rick Jelliffe questions the "anti-OOXML mob"
,----[ Quote ]
| Dog bites man vs. man bites dog
|
| Microsoft is used to play hard without any conservatism in terms of
| reputation. Other companies that were in a weaker market position adapted to
| a changing market environment and they are responsive to the public. The lack
| of care for reputation clearly plays in the hands of every campaigner. It's
| your favourite opponent because they will deliver you the lethal action you
| need to entertain your community. In a crime fiction about the Mafia no one
| is shocked by their killings because you expect it as natural. In the case of
| Microsoft this may result in the attitude of some bloggers to cry louder
| about foul play. I don't think this is the right approach but the economics
| of it is well understood.
`----
http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-46838/rick-jelliffe-questions-the-anti-ooxml-mob
Yes, that "mob" which is against bribery at all levels, bullying,
panel-stacking, one-company 'standard', anti-GPL licence and software patents.
Needless to say, Rick Jelliffe is paid by Microsoft. Fact.
Related:
Standards Australia denies OOXML bias
,----[ Quote ]
| Representatives from IBM, Google, Catalyst IT and Waugh Partners expressed
| their concern the appointment of Topologi director Rick Jelliffe to the
| delegation was not indicative of the wider industry view on OOXML
| standardization.
`----
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php?id=1735452258&rid=-50
The OOXML BRM and Australia: What happens next
,----[ Quote ]
| Senior project manager at Standards Australia, Panjan Navaratnam, will head
| the delegation and shoulder the responsibility for all Australian positions.
| He will be supported in an advisory role by technical expert Rick Jeliffe.
|
| Despite some concerns surrounding the objectivity of Jeliffe, Standards
| Australia insists that its delegates are not participating as an agent of any
| personal or organisational viewpoint.
`----
http://www.linuxworld.com.au/index.php?id=1392366014&rid=-50
Standards Australia defends Jelliffe he has never developed Microsoft products
,----[ Quote ]
| Look at this press release from Standards Australia, it is really funny how
| they carefully weight their words:
|
| The article also incorrectly describes Rick Jelliffe as a ‘Microsoft
| developer’. While Mr Jelliffe consults widely to industry and government
| including Microsoft, he has never developed Microsoft products.
|
| Let's rewrite it like this to see if it changes something:
|
| Rick Jelliffe is not a ‘Microsoft developer’ as such. While Mr Jelliffe
| is being paid for consultancy work by Microsoft, he is not developing
| Microsoft products.
|
| Where is the money?
`----
http://www.noooxml.org/forum/t-42872/standards-australia-defends-jelliffe:he-has-never-developed-microsoft-products
Microsoft developer joins Aussie OOXML standards delegation
,----[ Quote ]
| Last year Jelliffe was implicated in editing OOXML Wikipedia entries at the
| request of Microsoft. A public explanation is available on Jelliffe's blog.
`----
http://www.computerworld.com.au/index.php/id;445400562;fp;16;fpid;1
How to Get Your Platform Accepted as a Standard - Microsoft Style
,----[ Quote ]
| In the section of an internal manual on effective evangelism, written in 1997
| by James Plamondon, Technical Evangelist, he lays out an elaborate series of
| steps to get Microsoft's platforms accepted as de facto standards. Among the
| steps lists are working behind the scenes with supposedly independent but
| actually pliable and supportive analysts and consultants.
`----
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20071023002351958
EU Initiates Investigation Against Microsoft OOXML Push
,----[ Quote ]
| But with Steve Ballmer taking over as CEO, there was supposed to be a kinder,
| gentler Microsoft - one that would play nicely with its competitors. When
| antitrust regulators in turn challenged this new Microsoft, it issued not
| challenges to fight to the end to prove that it had done nothing illegal, but
| statements promising to "cooperate fully."
|
| But at the same time, Microsoft is still a tough competitor. As Microsoft's
| Director of Corporate Standards Jason Matusow famously warned at his blog
| last year:
|
| Make no mistake; all parties are looking at the full picture to find
| strategies that will result in the outcome they desire. Provided - of
| course - that they do so within the context of the rules that apply to
| the process, this is exactly what one should expect to happen. It is
| going to be a very interesting next few months.
|
| Indeed, the months that followed proved to be interesting indeed. Microsoft
| said that some of its employees became over zealous, most flagrantly in
| Sweden, where marketing assists were promised to several business partners as
| incentives to join the national standards committee and vote for OOXM.
`----
http://www.consortiuminfo.org/standardsblog/article.php?story=20080208082501776
EU Commission Investigating Microsoft's MSOOXML Push
,----[ Quote ]
| I hope they think to investigate the smear campaigns that seem to always
| happen to anyone on the other side from Microsoft. What happened to Peter
| Quinn was by no means unique.
`----
http://www.groklaw.net/article.php?story=20080208151410252
|
|
