Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Manufacturing Consent

____/ Linonut on Wednesday 12 March 2008 13:34 : \____

>    http://www.robweir.com/blog/2008/03/contra-durusau-part-1.html
> 
>    From the start Patrick has remained publicly silent on the topic of
>    OOXML. No blog posts, no press, nothing. If you asked, he would say
>    that this was his policy. Privately, you would get an earful (all
>    negative), but as befits the unbiased chair of the committee
>    which is responsible for the technical recommendation for the US NB,
>    he kept his personal opinions out of the public arena.
> 
>    This public orientation changed recently. As best I can figure it, on
>    returning from a conference in Seattle in late January, Patrick was a
>    changed man. Patrick is now an enthusiastic OOXML supporter and is
>    eager to inform the world of his delight in OOXML at every
>    opportunity. He posts his "open letters" on his web site, which are
>    linked to, often within minutes, by the various Microsoft bloggers,
>    and then sent around by Microsoft employees to the press and the
>    various JTC1 NB's.
> 
>    . . .
> 
>    Of course, Microsoft will not be so careful to distinguish Patrick's
>    personal opinions from his professional affiliations. So a post from
>    Patrick's personal web site is retold on a Microsoft blog as "The ODF
>    Editor says....", and then the next day is sent in an email to NB's
>    with a larger set of "endorsements": . . .
> 
>    http://thirdworldtraveler.com/Herman%20/Manufac_Consent_Prop_Model.html
> 
>    Manufacturing Consent
>    A Propaganda Model
> 
>    In countries where the levers of power are in the hands of a state
>    bureaucracy, the monopolistic control over the media, often
>    supplemented by official censorship, makes it clear that the media
>    serve the ends of a dominant elite. It is much more difficult to see
>    a propaganda system at work where the media are private and formal
>    censorship is absent. This is especially true where the media
>    actively compete, periodically attack and expose corporate and
>    governmental malfeasance, and aggressively portray themselves as
>    spokesmen for free speech and the general community interest. What is
>    not evident (and remains undiscussed in the media) is the limited
>    nature of such critiques, as well as the huge inequality in command
>    of resources, and its effect both on access to a private media system
>    and on its behavior and performance.

Good find (that latter one), which I will use later to sum this up. ;-)

One sentence comes to mind:

                "The emperor has no clothes"

-- 
                ~~ Best of wishes

Roy S. Schestowitz      |    "Oops. My brain just hit a bad sector"
http://Schestowitz.com  |  Open Prospects   |     PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Tasks: 176 total,   1 running, 175 sleeping,   0 stopped,   0 zombie
      http://iuron.com - knowledge engine, not a search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index