Jesper Lund Stocholm <jls2008@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> espoused:
> Moshe Goldfarb <brick.n.straw@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in
> news:4rw9slu5a5ct$.okdfhgy1mlmt$.dlg@xxxxxxxxxx:
>
>> On 24 Mar 2008 14:02:51 GMT, Jesper Lund Stocholm wrote:
>>
>>> Mark Kent <mark.kent@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
>>> news:17b4b5-kdt.ln1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
>>>
>>>
>>>> So, Jesper, what's your excuse for assisting in the breaking of
>>>> rules?
>>>
>>> I am not assisting in doing what you say.
>>
>> Just so you know what kind of a person you are dealing with Jesper,
>> here is some information about Mark Kent.
>>
>> As you can see he is a major hypocrite:
>
> Yes, I saw the thread with Mark's exposure
<chuckle>
I've always been quite open about my position, and unlike you, I post on
topic, pro-charter material. There isn't and never has been anything
to expose. I retain my openly and publicly stated position that open
platforms prevent vendor lock-in. I've put a line to this effect in my
.sig, so that anyone who thinks that I've been "exposed" can see that the
trolls have "exposed" a statement of what I've always said.
If you look on the internet, you'll see, as I've repeatedly stated in
cola, that I travel the world lecturing on this subject. My position is
and always has been the same.
A sub-text of that is that the abuse of standards processes, as you're
involved in, actively assists in vendor lock-in, which actively promotes
the abuse of customers by suppliers.
So again, what's your excuse for assisting in pushing an immature and
unimplemntable document through a fast-track process which was never
intended for such use?
... and no hiding behind childish "exposures" please.
--
| mark at ellandroad dot demon dot co dot uk |
| Cola faq: http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/ |
| Cola trolls: http://colatrolls.blogspot.com/ |
| Open platforms prevent vendor lock-in. Own your Own services! |
|
|