-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ seani on Friday 10 October 2008 10:20 : \____
> I'm reorganising our kit internally and I've decided to wipe a few of the
> older machines and reinstall. Usually I just let a chose livecd do it's
> thing unattended an spend 10 mins tweaking the result, and we're off.
>
> Generally this means accepting EXT3 as a default, but as reliability is
> top of the list as far as these particular boxes are concerned, I thought
> I'd give ZFS a spin.
>
> Any other suggestions? The principal aim is that the chosen FS could
> recover from inadvertent power failures and leave things in a consistent
> state. Performance isn't an issue - it would generally be a bit of
> browsing, some ssheet / wp work and a bit of printing.
ZFS Needs FUSE, so there's a performance penalty. The next Linux release ought
to have Btrfs from Oracle and maybe ext4, but for now, since reiserfs is
hardly maintained, ext3 seems like a good choice.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Roy S. Schestowitz | Data lacking semantics is currency in an island
http://Schestowitz.com | Free as in Free Beer | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Load average (/proc/loadavg): 0.67 0.85 0.95 4/267 12138
http://iuron.com - semantic search engine project initiative
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkjvS3QACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4xqgCgmr3tE+zsxZdmX1ozj7P0l/Rp
5SYAnis6kTeVlak6k8BSU4Qg749Hc+bt
=/YF3
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|