Hadron wrote:
> Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> writes:
>
>> * Tim Smith peremptorily fired off this memo:
>>
>>> If I'd simply quoted Roy-written text or linked to it, you would not
>>> have looked, your automatic belief in everything Roy says would have
>>> kicked in.
>>
>> Don't give me that crap, Tim.
>>
>> By nature, I'm a skeptic. I think for myself.
>>
>> I've already explained many times my thoughts on Roy.
>>
>>> By just citing the original article, I was giving you a chance to read
>>> it, and be puzzled why I would mention since an innocent story as if
>>> there was something significant. I figured that you would express that
>>> puzzlement, Roy would see that and jump in, and demonstrate how loony he
>>> actually is, in a way that even you might see as looney.
>>
>> Unfortunately not.
>>
>> I think Paul Thurott is more loony than Roy is, and Moshe, DFS, and even
>> Hadron exceed Roy in lunacy, and are certainly often way more
>> unpleasant
>
> Could you quote some of this lunacy? Maybe you could quote me bad
> mouthing Linux too where I did not back it up with facts? Or is your
> head too deep in the sand?
>
You don't back up anything with facts.
Claiming that "half of the hardware does not work" is not "fact".
Claiming that SATA does not work is not fact, it is a flat out lie
< snip >
--
Don't abandon hope: your Tom Mix decoder ring arrives tomorrow
|
|
