Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Windows has only 20% market share in China

  • Subject: Windows has only 20% market share in China
  • From: Linonut <linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Thu, 4 Sep 2008 13:26:00 -0400
  • Bytes: 3318
  • Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
  • Organization: Part of the new AT&T!
  • Reply-to: linonut@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
  • User-agent: slrn/0.9.8.1 (Linux)
  • Xref: ellandroad.demon.co.uk comp.os.linux.advocacy:686325
   http://au.legalbusinessonline.com/news/breaking-news/29332/details.aspx

According to Microsoft.  Approximately.

   When lawyer Dong Zhengwei, a partner with Beijing-based Zhongyin law
   firm grabbed the headlines by alleging that Microsoft was using its
   dominant market share to manipulate software prices in China and
   calling for a US$1bn fine to be imposed on the global software giant,
   Microsoft global VP Zhang Yaqin was quick to reply with an
   interesting counter argument: "Microsoft did not even have the
   preconditions of conducting monopoly activities in China," he
   said "genuine Microsoft products have a very low market share in
   China because its products are widely pirated."

According to 2006 figures from the Business Software Alliance, an
industry group that tracks the illegal software trade, an estimated 82%
of software installed on computers in China were pirated.

I suppose I should mark this one [Troll].

Comments:

   Extensive pirating is the perfect way for Microsoft to gain market
   share in rapidly developing nations. No responsibility, no costs, no
   need to give discounts on weird special versions and no need to
   battle anti-trust suits. Strong anti-piracy measures can be brought
   to bear after the fish has swallowed the bait

   Extensive pirating is the perfect way for Microsoft to gain market
   share in rapidly developing nations. No responsibility, no need to
   give discounts on weird special versions and no need to battle
   anti-trust suits.

   There may not be case law for guidance, but in my opinion it should
   appear evident to a specialist that fake products should be included
   as part of the relevant market if, in the consumers view, it could
   turn out to be an economical and technical alternative to licensed
   products if there is a small but significant and non transitory
   increase in price. This question has been already answered by
   consumers. It suffices only to observe the widespread use of
   unlicensed versions of MSWindows in the Chinese market

-- 
You are so boring that when I see you my feet go to sleep.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index