On 2009-02-03, Ezekiel <Zeke@xxxxx> wrote:
>
> "Rex Ballard" <rex.ballard@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:266ded66-8359-4f14-9887-0e5ab988b77d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> On Feb 2, 7:04 pm, "Ezekiel" <Z...@xxxxx> wrote:
>>> "Rex Ballard" <rex.ball...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:ad5d7665-db9a-4731-a8b1-8ca2a2a6541b@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>
>>> > On Feb 2, 5:56 pm, ray <r...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> >> Actually, I'm not so sure they'e very good at marketing - I think
>>> >> they're great at extortion.
>>
>>> > They have publicly admitted, in court, to fraud, extortion, blackmail,
>>> > sabotage, and obstruction of justice,
>>
>>> Then you won't have trouble backing up this latest claim of yours. Of
>>> course you won't because you'll hide behind some BS story of how the
>>> court
>>> records were sealed. Yet you think that people will believe a liar like
>>> you.
>>
>> Judge Thomas Penfield Jackson, shortly after issuing his rulings of
>> law, and just before releasing the final remedy judgment told a
>> reporter that, based on the evidence presented in the case,
>> Microsoft's top executives were criminals and should face criminal
>> prosecution.
>
> I don't give a crap what Judge Jackson had to say or what his opinion was.
> Your claim is:
...yes.
"Nevermind that it's been proven that Microsoft are crooks."
"We're only interested in the claim that Microsoft has admitted they
are crooks."
[deletia]
--
If you think that an 80G disk can hold HUNDRENDS of |||
hours of DV video then you obviously haven't used iMovie either. / | \
|
|
