William Poaster wrote:
> On Mon, 05 Jan 2009 13:42:29 -0500, Chris Ahlstrom wrote:
>
>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Rex Ballard belched out
>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>
>>> On Dec 31 2008, 5:57 pm, "DFS" <nospam@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>>>>> The Free Software Movement and the Struggle for Freedom of Thought
>>>> blah blah blah
>>>> Why are you linking to Moglen, Spamowitz?
>>>> You're a promoter and developer of proprietary systems who insists on
>>>> being paid for his work, and whose commitment to open source and free
>>>> software begins and ends at your wallet.
>>>> Same for [H]ypocrite. Ballard. Linonut. JED. Rasker. 7. Hilliard.
>>>> Kohlmann. chrisv. Dumb Willie Poaster. Marti. HPT. et al.
>> Poor DFS. Still pounding that poor excuse for an argument. And it is
>> partly a lie anyway.
>
> AFAIC it's a lie. I do NOT promote or develop anything to do with
> proprietary systems.
> I wouldn't touch windoze with a 20ft barge pole.
>
> So DumbForSure lies yet again.
Of corse he lies, as usual.
I'm looking forward, DFS to provide a link to my proprietary work.
>> It's already been answered, but he'll keep trotting in out the way he
>> keeps banging on his screenshot of a synaptic misconfiguration.
>>
>>> I work for GBS, I'm a consultant. Much of Websphere is based on Open
>>> Source technology, however, the proprietary extensions and plug-ins
>>> provide the wizards to generate code that would take my teams several
>>> staff-weeks at around $100/hour to write by hand.
>> Open-source depends on well-fed programmers.
>>
>> DFS should be blessing us for promoting open-source, since we do it with
>> our voices, our feet, /and/ our wallets.
>
--
|_|0|_| Marti T. van Lin
|_|_|0| http://ml2mst.googlepages.com
|0|0|0| http://osgeex.blogspot.com
|
|
