-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ 7 on Sunday 12 July 2009 18:13 : \____
> Logan Rathbone wrote:
>> On 2009-07-12, 7 <website_has_email@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>> This is (a non exaustive) list of what canonical has been suckered into
>>> paying for developers so far to be written for micoshaft's mono to get it
>>> inside ubuntu:
>> I've seen you post this list many, many times now. It's getting really
>> annoying. /We get the picture, already/.
> I'm hoping some asstroturfer will give some clue away. Nothing so far yet.
They have already given some clues away. They promote Mono. It means it's bad
for GNU/Linux. Conveniently confirmatory.
~~ Best of wishes
When computers emit smoke, it means they've chosen a new Pope.
Unfortunately, they invariably choose the wrong one and immediately get
condemned to nonfunctionality for heresy. -- Anthony DeBoer
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----