Ezekiel wrote:
>
> "Peter K�hlmann" <peter-koehlmann@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
> news:h3cn84$2oj$01$2@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> Ezekiel wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> "Chris Ahlstrom" <ahlstromc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
>>> news:TOk6m.22069$he4.15186@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Tim Smith belched out
>>>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>>>
>>>>> In article <%_16m.9631$Uf1.6865@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
>>>>> Chris Ahlstrom <ahlstromc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> After takin' a swig o' grog, Homer belched out
>>>>>> this bit o' wisdom:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> > Verily I say unto thee, that Chris Ahlstrom spake thusly:
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> >> Roy, toss Timmy a doggie drop.
>>>>>> >
>>>>>> > Lace it with cyanide first.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The normal way to disable an attack dog is strychnine.
>>>>>
>>>>> Interesting how you got all offended when Hadron called you a
>>>>> freetard--and insisted that Miguel must agree with the use of that
>>>>> word because he included it when he quoted Hadron, yet when Homer
>>>>> suggest that I should be killed, not only do you leave that in
>>>>> (which means that you agree with the sentiment, by your own
>>>>> reasoning from the "freetard" incident), but you offer suggestions
>>>>> as to the most appropriate method.
>>>>
>>>> Poor puppy. Here's a nice steak for ya. Now stop barking.
>>>
>>> Poor coward. Unable to defend your own hypocrisy.
>>
>> No need. Because Tim Smith could not refrain from totally
>> misrepresenting what actually took place.
>> Why should Chris "defend" something which did not at all happen like
>> Tim Smith was lying about?
>
> So we can add reading and comprehension to the long list of things that
> you know absolutely nothing about.
>
> The previous issue was that if someone "quoted" a reply (as in Miguel's
> "freetard" case) then the implication is that they person agrees with
> it. Go learn the basics of threaded programming and let the grown ups
> debate this.
The previous issue is that Tim Smiths account of that thread is a lie, no
matter what you want to make it into
--
I refuse to have a battle of wits with an unarmed person.
|
|
