-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
____/ Erik Jan on Tuesday 17 February 2009 20:33 : \____
>
>
> Rex Ballard had de volgende lumineuze gedachte op 17-02-09 19:29:
>
>>
>> Microsoft is frantically trying to prove that OO is inadequate for
>> displaying DOCX files, yet all they are really proving is that MS-
>> Office is a terrible medium for generating reviewable files that can
>> be reviewed and edited using 3rd party software.
>>
>
> I would have thought that OOXML being an OPEN format could be read by
> any wordprocessor that has been given the freely available code. How can
> OO.o be inadequate?
>
> Is Microsoft's "frantically trying" proving MS's failure to make a
> really open format? And why would MS do this? It has "frantically" tried
> to get OOXML accepted as an open standard.
'"Frantically" tried' seriously underlays a reality of organised crime.
- --
~~ Best of wishes
Steve Ballmer is even monkier than his moniker suggests
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Swap: 4088500k total, 417880k used, 3670620k free, 264040k cached
http://iuron.com - next generation of search paradigms
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAkm0+fIACgkQU4xAY3RXLo4rAACfTNBWSfIp3bHDwrGPJu3CNwn6
LpIAn1M1SKUtmDTrROpiM/pGBgsrBAaH
=Rpk1
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
|
|
