Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: GNU Hurd vs Linux in Numbers

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

____/ Peter KÃhlmann on Tuesday 19 Jul 2011 16:49 : \____

> Homer wrote:
> 
>> Verily I say unto thee, that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>>>
>>> Test Driving GNU Hurd, With Benchmarks Against Linux
>> 
>> The test suite is still largely incompatible with Hurd, so I think
>> they're jumping the gun a bit. Even so, it still managed to keep up for
>> the most part, but then they were really just testing the difference
>> between filesystems more than the kernel itself.
>> 
>> It's early days, but I'm encouraged to see Hurd back on track.
>> 
> 
> That seems a bit euphemistic.
> It is *at* *least* 12 - 15 years behind linux now. No SMP support. Only 386-
> support. Next to no drivers. If X runs at all, it is a version needed which
> you have to fish out of a junk box because it is so outdated

Would Hurd reuse some GPLv2-licensed bits from Linux if Linux was to
move some packages to GPLv3 over time? I'm just asking...

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes

Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com  | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
Non-profit search engine proposal @ http://iuron.com
Contact E-mail address (direct): s at schestowitz dot com
Contact Internet phone (SIP): schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx (24/7)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAk4lrKQACgkQU4xAY3RXLo5SPQCeNRJKAySBmtKO3e5FXVE41sZ7
smIAnjGjE/LCa2CrYpd5CRYRIgOap7Jj
=p12u
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index