Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Snit's Usual Microsoft Anti-Linux Propaganda Line Gets Refuted In TechRights IRC

Hash: SHA1

____/ High Plains Thumper on Wednesday 10 Aug 2011 13:50 : \____

> Roy Schestowitz wrote:
>> High Plains Thumper on Thursday:
>>> Example: thacker. thacker starts by ignoring the previous comment
>>> (which itself was a rational challenge to thacker's earlier
>>> statements), repeating himself (see the section below on Repeating
>>> themselves), then moves onto an analogy. Afterwards he continues with
>>> personal attacks, starting subtly worded, then increasingly harsh:
>>>     * "some here, yourself included, will not see nor understand the
>>> parallels"
>>>     * "Your noses are simply buried too deeply into the proverbial
>>>     bark." * "Or you lack the courage, will, ability to step away and
>>>     ask the
>>> truly difficult questions. That is a shame." [/quote]
>>> http://tantek.pbworks.com/w/page/19403022/TrollTaxonomy
>>> Snit fits the description precisely. He does it to disrupt this
>>> newsgroup, as he did the Mac advocacy group.
>> That's quite the 0wn4g3, but frankly, I still think Snit is just a soul
>> in the wrong forum.
> Aren't all the Wintrolls? If he is just a soul in the wrong forum, why
> does he create strawmen and use forged evidence from his website to
> reinforce his arguments? Snip the truth and continue in denial to spout
> the same age old anti-Linux rants? Support the other Wintrolls and harass
> the Linux advocates?
> His discussion against advocates fit the general description provided by
> the authors of the FAQ:
> [quote]
> 7.1 Disinformation
>    If COLA were a physical location like a building where those who would
>    advocate the growth of the Linux operating systems and the Linux
>    community gather, the anti-Linux propagandists would be raiding that
>    building. They would be vandalizing the building, painting graffiti on
>    the walls, defecating and urinating on the floors and furniture,
>    breaking down the doors, setting fire to the building and physically
>    assaulting the resident Linux advocates and the visitors who happen to
>    be in the building at the time of the raid.
> [/quote]
> http://www.faqs.org/faqs/linux/advocacy/faq-and-primer/
> If Snit is a soul in a wrong forum, then why does he continue to lie,
> deny proof of his dirty deeds and ad hominem belittle his "opponent"?
> Snit: "Ask him to support any of his claims and he completely falls
> apart. His freak-out against me started when he accused me for forging
> videos and screenshots - and when I pointed out he had *no* evidence for
> this and how others had even replicated what he claimed was 'forged', he
> completely freaked out."
> HPT: "No one freaked out, Snit Michael Glasser. You would like to believe
> with your wildest imagination that it caused me such deep despair; but
> alas, it didn't. You made a fool of yourself with your forged 'evidence'.
> Again."
> Snit: "You accused me of forging evidence... though when challenged on
> that accusation your folded and cried like a baby... never producing a
> shred of evidence nor explaining why so many others were able to
> replicate what I showed in at least some of the material you called
> forged. You were proved wrong about your accusations and wrong about your
> ability to follow simple directions. And, yes, you freaked out: posting
> irrelevant and forged quotes about me, going on the offensive instead of
> accepting and admitting to your error. You acted like a small child
> having a tantrum. And you have yet to really get over it."
> Date: Sun, 31 Jul 2011 16:31:39 -0700
> Subject: Re: TROLL ALERT - STALKER Desktop Linux systems
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/afe0cb16cc2a3bb5
> Example of a Snit ad hominem attack:
> HPT: "Any good that he states is seriously heavily outweighed by his
> remaining disparaging posts."
> Snit: "Poor HPT: he loathes the fact I called him on his lies. Hey, you
> lying jerk, where is your evidence I forged videos and the like? Oh. You
> have no evidence. You are just a lying piece of... defecation."
> HPT: "You have an uncanny ability to confirm my statements." 06 Aug 2011,
> Subject: Re: TomB and his accusations
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/4db131af050a4896
> Snit initiated that thread as an ad hominem attack against Linux Advocate
> TomB.
> Snit's FUD has been debunked many times, as summarised by this Linux
> advocate:
> 75- Lusotec (COLA): "You have started threads on this subject many times,
> and many times it has been explained to you how X copy & paste should
> work and how bugs in a application are not bugs in the system, but still
> you return to this subject and post the same false statements."  09 Mar
> 2011
> http://groups.google.com/group/comp.os.linux.advocacy/msg/37032133fbe9db92
> Lusotec is a very knowledgeable Linux user. I could go on and on ad
> nauseum, but the best place for Snit is in a kill bin. That is a
> universal concurrence.

He is sometimes trolling our IRC channels now.

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes

Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com  | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
Non-profit search engine proposal @ http://iuron.com
Contact E-mail address (direct): s at schestowitz dot com
Contact Internet phone (SIP): schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx (24/7)
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index