-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ Sneaky Weasel on Thursday 08 Sep 2011 04:46 : \____
> On 09/07/2011 08:35 PM, Homer wrote:
>> Verily I say unto thee that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>>> Linux for me, Linux for you.
>>> ,----[ Quote ]
>>> | In essence all Linux systems are the same. They all have the same
>>> | tools, they all pretty much have the same desktops and they all can
>>> | be configured, adjusted, tweeked or modified to look and operate in
>>> | just about any manner. The only real difference is the ease of
>>> | which this can be done.
>> That's the substantive point most of the "too many distros" nuts fail to
>> appreciate. Every distro offers the same software, but they all provide
>> access to that software using different paradigms, some of which are
>> "easier" than others. There's also a difference in the default packages,
>> default dependencies, default configurations, etc., but all of those can
>> be changed by the user, so really the actual difference is just the
>> presentation, the methods employed to manage the system, and the merit
>> of the developers and community behind the distro. This is why GNU/Linux
>> can (paradoxically) be both a standard and diverse (or "fractured", as
>> the critics might say) at the same time.
>> I can rebuild any GNU/Linux distro from scratch, but it's far easier to
>> do that with Gentoo, because that's intrinsically how Gentoo works. I
>> can create a very minimal GNU/Linux installation from any distro, but
>> it's easier to do so with Tiny Core Linux or Fedora AOS, since that's
>> specifically what they're designed for. I can create a set-top box media
>> system from any GNU/Linux distro, but it's easier with GeeXboX, since
>> it's preconfigured to do that straight out of the box.
>> GNU/Linux may have an endless set of choices and possibilities, but many
>> people have already done the hard work to combine those possibilities
>> into easy choices, for those who want them. The freedom and flexibility
>> of GNU/Linux means people can continue combining those possibilities
>> into even more choices, "easy" or otherwise.
> The work they did is excellent. Ubuntu is great. Mint is perfect. There
> are many other choices and people can pick what they want.
Which one did you choose? My main desktop runs Kubuntu (because I love
KDE) and the secondary one Squeeze with KDE. One acts as a server (the
Debian one), so I do need the diversity.
Windows and OS X a one-product shop.
~~ Best of wishes
Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
Non-profit search engine proposal @ http://iuron.com
Contact E-mail address (direct): s at schestowitz dot com
Contact Internet phone (SIP): schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx (24/7)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----