Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: Linux Spits Apple Out

Hash: SHA1

Just catching up with this thread (82 messages unread...

____/ Homer on Monday 12 Sep 2011 14:02 : \____

> Verily I say unto thee that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>> ____/ Homer on Sunday 11 Sep 2011 22:06 : \____
>>> Verily I say unto thee that Roy Schestowitz spake thusly:
>>>> It was not 5 windows. Whoever claimed this was lying to you by
>>>> omission. See footage where entire floors are in fact on fire (heavy
>>>> fire) for hours and hours.  It was videotapes (you need to see the
>>>> right side of the building).
>>> Yes, fires that were extinguished by 5:20PM.
>> Damage was already done, so that is not the main point.
> The "damage" from office furniture fires melted steel columns up to
> 54x22 inches thick, uniformly in such a manner that they all failed
> simultaneously, causing a perfect, vertical, freefall collapse?

It was not freefall speed. Measure the
collapse duration, then do the maths 
with g=9.8 and building height. The steel
is interconnected and once set in motion it goes down
fast, perfectly vertical, as one ought 
o expect. The steel itself did not need to melt, just soften.

See for example http://ur1.ca/5351y

I used to see some of the sceptics' videos and they
hid from the viewer evidence that would have easily
punctured holes in their hypothesis (mainly one
of controlled demolition).

> Uh-huh.
>>> Claims?
>>> I can see it quite clearly in the video footage:
>>> http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Zv7BImVvEyk
>>> Anyone who can look at that and still pretend it's not a controlled
>>> demolition, must be taking hallucinogenic drugs.
>> That's just a false option/dichotomy.
> Do you have another theory?

Yes, my position on 9/11 is that it needs 
a proper investigation not because of
allegations of "controlled demolition"
but because not enough intelligence
was done to catch quite a lot of
well-coordinated terrorists, who
should have been caught prior to the
act. I am not suggesting that the government
just "let it happen", just that it was 
negligent enough not to cover its arse.
It's easier to say that after a disaster,
though (like wearing a seatbelt /after/
a car accident).

- -- 
		~~ Best of wishes

Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz (Ph.D. Medical Biophysics), Imaging Researcher
http://Schestowitz.com  | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
Non-profit search engine proposal @ http://iuron.com
Contact E-mail address (direct): s at schestowitz dot com
Contact Internet phone (SIP): schestowitz@xxxxxxxxx (24/7)
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index