-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
____/ Homer on Tuesday 22 Nov 2011 18:46 : \____
> Verily I say unto thee that Hardon spake thusly:
>> "In particular, in the IT sector, it is obvious it is not the only
>> case. Apple and Samsung is only one case where IP rights can be used
>> as an instrument to restrict competition," he said, according to a
>> Reuters report.
> The word "duh!" comes to mind.
> Has the EU only just figured out that the government-granted artificial
> privilege of "IP" monopoly is "an instrument to restrict competition"?
> Ya think?
> Well if they believe, as I do, that this is a problem, then surely the
> solution is simple: don't grant that monopoly in the first place.
> Or is that too obvious?
Patents are tools of exclusion. How are they /anything/ other than competition
stiflers? "You are not allowed to do this" is not promoting innovation, either.
~~ Best of wishes
Dr. Roy S. Schestowitz, Research Fellow
http://Schestowitz.com | GNU/Linux administration | PGP-Key: 0x74572E8E
Editor @ http://techrights.org & Broadcaster @ http://bytesmedia.co.uk/
Managing partner @ http://scifitness.co.uk & http://iuron.com
GPL-licensed 3-D Othello @ http://othellomaster.com
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----