<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>schestowitz.com</title>
	<atom:link href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog</link>
	<description>Reflections on Technology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 05:06:53 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
		<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
		<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=3.9.40</generator>
	<item>
		<title>The Cyber Show on the News</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/18/the-cyber-show-on-the-news/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/18/the-cyber-show-on-the-news/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Aug 2026 05:06:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8942</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T finally rains. Quite a bit, too. When will we have as much climate change news coverage as we used to? Rather than the news demanding that we accept the cause of climate change, things like useless data centres (for slop), or otherwise be &#8220;cranks&#8221;? &#8220;The News used to be Crime,&#8221; The Cyber Show writes [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />T <b>finally</b> rains. Quite a bit, too.</p>
<p>When will we have as much climate change news coverage as we used to?</p>
<p>Rather than the news demanding that we accept the cause of climate change, things like useless data centres (for slop), or otherwise be &#8220;cranks&#8221;?</p>
<p>&#8220;The News used to be Crime,&#8221; <a href="https://cybershow.uk/content/home/home.html">The Cyber Show writes today</a>. &#8220;Pollution. Death. War. Disaster. Crime. Pollution. Death. War. Disaster… And now here&#8217;s Kate with the weather… and we&#8217;d all stop worrying and smile. Now it&#8217;s the other way round.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/18/the-cyber-show-on-the-news/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>The Premier League&#8217;s New Rules (by IFAB) Would Devastate Brett Wilson LLP</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/ifab-brett-wilson-llp/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/ifab-brett-wilson-llp/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 20:59:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Opinion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sport]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[New rules against time-wasting, a tactic of Brett Wilson LLP (they doubled the duration of the recent hearing where we had an experienced legal team that included two barristers) can recall the hearing we had last month very well. How can I forget? Unlike the applicant, we attended it. He did not! He was in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>New rules <b>against time-wasting</b>, a tactic of Brett Wilson LLP (<a href="https://techrights.org/litigation.shtml">they doubled the duration of the recent hearing</a> where we had an experienced legal team that included two barristers)</em></p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/timewaste.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/timewaste.png" alt="The Premier League have today confirmed the new laws introduced by IFAB that will be part of the 2026/27 season." width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8940" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> can recall the hearing we had last month very well. How can I forget? Unlike the applicant, we attended it. He did not! He was in London at the time, but he chose to <u>not even show up</u>.</p>
<p>My barrister told me that his barrister was intentionally &#8220;time-wasting&#8221;. It was not hard to see this, he was very repetitive and clearly he tried to deny our side (<b>two</b> barristers) enough time to get across points. It was an exceptionally hot week, so those in the Court were already tired by the time our barristers had a say.</p>
<p>If &#8220;time-wasting&#8221; is a legal tactic (like stalling), then the Court needs to curtail it, even penalise for it.</p>
<p>Our barristers aren&#8217;t cheap and my barrister is vastly more experienced that the time waster&#8217;s.</p>
<p>Tomorrow I&#8217;ll write about these tactics in <em>Techrights</em>. The headline will be: &#8220;Decades of Debt, Weaponing Borrowed Money to Try to Put Critics in Debt&#8221;.</p>
<p><b>Prior parts below</b>:</p>
<table class="results">
<tr>
<td id="15153">2026-03-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/03/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_1_Out_of_200_Claim_No_KB_202.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 1 Out of 200: Claim No. KB-2024-001270 in a Nutshell</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15173">2026-03-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/04/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_2_Out_of_200_Detailed_Timeli.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 2 Out of 200: Detailed Timeline From 2012 (Attack on Reporters That Question Restricted Boot) to 2024 (Lawsuit Against Reporter and His Wife in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15196">2026-03-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/05/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_3_Out_of_200_A_More_In_Depth.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 3 Out of 200: A More In-Depth Breakdown</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15217">2026-03-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/06/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_4_Out_of_200_Rianne_s_Versio.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 4 Out of 200: Rianne’s Version of Events and Narrative</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15249">2026-03-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/07/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_5_Out_of_200_Clearly_Not_a_S.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 5 Out of 200: Clearly Not a Security Professional/Expert, Only Ever Pretending to be One</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15268">2026-03-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/08/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_6_Out_of_200_Intentionally_M.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 6 Out of 200: Intentionally Misnaming Women, People Who Offered to Testify That They Too Had Been Subjected to Similar Abuse</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15287">2026-03-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/09/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_7_Out_of_200_Like_With_the_S.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 7 Out of 200: Like With the Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Misuse of UK-GDPR to Try to Hide Embarrassing Facts</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15313">2026-03-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/10/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_8_Out_of_200_Gross_Misuse_of.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 8 Out of 200: Gross Misuse of UKGDPR to Protect the Agenda of American Back Doors (Mass Surveillance)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15339">2026-03-11</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/11/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_9_Out_of_200_5RB_Barrister_D.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 9 Out of 200: 5RB Barrister Does Not Even Know the Name of His Own Client (That He Was Paid Well Over $200,000 to &#8216;Speak&#8217; or &#8216;Cover&#8217; for)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15358">2026-03-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/12/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_10_Out_of_200_Showing_Public.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 10 Out of 200: Showing Public Tweets is Not a Privacy Violation, But This Isn&#8217;t About Justice, It&#8217;s About Censorship</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15394">2026-03-13</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/13/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_11_Out_of_200_Cannot_Censor_.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 11 Out of 200: Cannot Censor His Spouse, Accusations Are Repeated Today</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15408">2026-03-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/14/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_12_Out_of_200_Months_Ahead_o.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 12 Out of 200: Months Ahead of Serial Strangler From Microsoft Who Helped Double the Lawsuits (Funded by Third Parties) as &#8216;Revenge&#8217; for Exposing Crimes</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15429">2026-03-15</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/15/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_13_Out_of_200_Abuse_of_Proce.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 13 Out of 200: Abuse of Process to Make False Accusations of UKGDPR Violations</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15448">2026-03-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/16/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_14_Out_of_200_The_Abusive_Ca.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 14 Out of 200: The Abusive Cases of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft and His Litigation Buddy Garrett Did Cause &#8220;Serious Harm&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15473">2026-03-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/17/Microsofters_SLAPP_Censorship_Part_14_Out_of_200_Men_Who_Strang.shtml">Microsofters&#8217; SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 14 Out of 200: Men Who Strangle Women (and Worse) Trying to Force Us to Write Public Apologies to These Men</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15497">2026-03-18</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_15_Out_of_200_Background_and_Particulars_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 15 Out of 200: Background and Particulars of Truth Regarding Techrights and Tux Machines</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15519">2026-03-19</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_16_Out_of_200_Detailing_the_Actors_and_Ex.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 16 Out of 200: Detailing the Actors and Explaining Techrights&#8217; Own Internet Relay Chat (IRC) Network</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15543">2026-03-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_17_Out_of_200_A_Long_Track_Record_of_Onli.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 17 Out of 200: A Long Track Record of Online Abuse, Then Choosing a Low-Cost Law Firm to Muzzle People Who Have Illuminated This Abuse for Over a Decade</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15566">2026-03-21</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_18_Out_of_200_Third_Parties_Funding_Attac.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 18 Out of 200: Third Parties Funding Attacks on the Messengers, Lawsuits Against GAFAM-Critical Voices That Uphold Real National Security</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15579">2026-03-22</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_19_Out_of_200_They_Were_Ill_prepared_for_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 19 Out of 200: They Were Ill-prepared for Tough Questions in Cross-Examination</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15598">2026-03-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_20_Out_of_200_All_Roads_Lead_to_Rome_and_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 20 Out of 200: All Roads Lead to Rome and to GAFAM Funding</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15605">2026-03-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_21_Out_of_200_It_s_About_Behaviour_Online.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 21 Out of 200: It&#8217;s About Behaviour Online, Not How Much Money From Shadowy Third Parties Gets Spent on Lawyers and Two Barristers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15619">2026-03-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_22_Out_of_200_When_You_Complain_People_Im.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 22 Out of 200: When You Complain People Impersonate You in IRC (But You Yourself Impersonate People in IRC and Lock Them Out of Their IRC Handles)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15631">2026-03-25</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_23_Out_of_200_We_Were_Right_All_Along_for.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 23 Out of 200: We Were Right All Along (for 2 Years) About Third Party Funding and Willingness to &#8216;Break the Bank&#8217; in Pursuit of &#8220;Revenge&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15648">2026-03-26</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_24_Out_of_200_The_Failed_Effort_by_Brett_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 24 Out of 200: The Failed Effort by Brett Wilson LLP to Strike Out My Lawsuit and My Wife&#8217;s Lawsuit Against Garrett (the Master Allowed Our Lawsuits to Proceed)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15672">2026-03-27</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_25_Out_of_200_That_Time_Matthew_J_Garrett.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 25 Out of 200: That Time Matthew J. Garrett Got Temporarily Banned/Suspended From Twitter</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15689">2026-03-28</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_26_Out_of_200_Asking_for_Documents_and_In.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 26 Out of 200: Asking for Documents and Information You Already Have, Even Letters and E-mails That You Yourself Sent!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15707">2026-03-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_27_Out_of_200_Using_the_Tor_Network_to_Hi.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 27 Out of 200: Using the Tor Network to Hide From Consequences</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15728">2026-03-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_28_Out_of_200_Facing_Consequences_for_Imp.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 28 Out of 200: Facing Consequences for Impersonation and Worse</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15751">2026-03-31</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/03/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_29_Out_of_200_Violent_Language_Won_t_Go_A.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 29 Out of 200: Violent Language Won&#8217;t Go Away When You Use It in Your Site, Blog, and Social Control Media</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15776">2026-04-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_30_Out_of_200_The_Time_We_Reported_Abuse_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 30 Out of 200: The Time We Reported Abuse to Greater Manchester Police (GMP) and It Was Escalated to Its Cybercrime Unit</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15790">2026-04-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_31_Out_of_200_Speaking_About_20_Years_of_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 31 Out of 200: Speaking About 20+ Years of Alleged Harassment/Defamation and High-Profile &#8216;Targets&#8217; of Garrett</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15808">2026-04-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_32_Out_of_200_Garrett_Made_Spurious_Reque.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 32 Out of 200: Garrett Made Spurious Requests (Later Withdrawn) the Same Week Someone He Later Spoke to by E-mail Sent Threats to Our Webhost</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15814">2026-04-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_33_Out_of_200_Garrett_Sued_by_My_Wife_and.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 33 Out of 200: Garrett Sued by My Wife and I, Then His Microsoft Acquaintance Files Another Lawsuit and Our Webhost Receives Legal Threats Too</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15830">2026-04-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_34_Out_of_200_The_Necessity_of_Transparen.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 34 Out of 200: The Necessity of Transparency, Illuminating Garrett&#8217;s and Graveley&#8217;s &#8216;Tag-Team&#8217; Act, Misusing the British Docket (From Far Away in America) in Efforts to Hide Bad Behaviour</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15843">2026-04-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_35_Out_of_200_How_to_Make_10_000_Pound_St.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 35 Out of 200: How to Make ~10,000 Pound Sterling (13,220.50 United States Dollars) by Copy-Pasting and Editing 10 Pages</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15865">2026-04-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_36_Out_of_200_Claim_KB_2024_003529_in_a_N.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 36 Out of 200: Claim KB-2024-003529 in a Nutshell (Microsoft Employee Does Terrible Things, Then Sues the Reporter in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15890">2026-04-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_37_Out_of_200_The_Correct_Suspicion_Garre.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 37 Out of 200: The Correct Suspicion Garrett and Graveley Were Collaborating in Overseas Litigation Against Critics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15903">2026-04-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_38_Out_of_200_Advertisement_or_10_000_Cla.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 38 Out of 200: Advertisement or £10,000+ Classified Ad in the Form of Court Filing in Another Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15916">2026-04-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_39_Out_of_200_Recycled_Text_for_Garrett_a.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 39 Out of 200: Recycled Text for Garrett and Graveley (Buy One, Get One Free?)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15922">2026-04-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_40_Out_of_200_Putting_Forth_Frivolous_Cla.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 40 Out of 200: Putting Forth Frivolous Claim Only a Few Days Before Running Out of Time (12 Months)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15942">2026-04-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_41_Out_of_200_More_Misuse_of_UK_GDPR_for_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 41 Out of 200: More Misuse of UK-GDPR (for US Citizens), More Copy-Pasting for Garrett and Graveley, Alleging That Publishing Unflattering Information is a &#8216;Privacy&#8217; Issue</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15948">2026-04-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_42_Out_of_200_Getting_the_Very_Basic_Tech.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 42 Out of 200: Getting the Very Basic Technical Concepts Very Wrong, or Where Miscomprehension Begets &#8220;Plausible Deniability&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15969">2026-04-11</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_43_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Partic.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 43 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims Almost Identical and 5RB Needs to Investigate Its Barristers (Its Reputation is at Stake)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15980">2026-04-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_44_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Copypa.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 44 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley &#8216;Copypasta&#8217; Sunday (Copy-Paste, Add One Word, Change &#8216;T&#8217; to &#8216;t&#8217;)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="15993">2026-04-13</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_45_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Cases_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 45 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Cases Inherently the Same, Their Legal Team Can Barely Even Distinguish (Full Timeline)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16002">2026-04-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_46_Out_of_200_Alex_Graveley_s_Attorney_Ri.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 46 Out of 200: Alex Graveley&#8217;s Attorney Rick Cofer Did Not Deny That Graveley Had Strangled Women; He Did, However, Pay Local Officials</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16008">2026-04-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_47_Out_of_200_British_Courts_Are_Not_Cens.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 47 Out of 200: British Courts Are Not Censorship Offices for Americans Funded by Affluent Third Parties</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16028">2026-04-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_48_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_and_5RB_Co.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 48 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB Copy-Pasting Bogus Claims for Violent Americans (Microsoft) Who Tell Women to Kill Themselves</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16047">2026-04-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_49_Out_of_200_Two_Americans_One_Case_Recy.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 49 Out of 200: Two Americans, One Case, Recycled for Low Budget at Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB Barristers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16059">2026-04-18</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_50_Out_of_200_The_Time_Staff_of_Law_Firm_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 50 Out of 200: The Time Staff of Law Firm Burgess Mee Was Showing Up in Letters Sent for a Serial Strangler From Microsoft</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16073">2026-04-19</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_51_Out_of_200_On_Perjury_and_What_It_Mean.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 51 Out of 200: On Perjury and What It Means to Take Third-Party Funding to Attack Reporter and His Family (in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16081">2026-04-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_52_Out_of_200_Phil_Golding_Appointed_Bar_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 52 Out of 200: Phil Golding Appointed Bar Standards Board (BSB) Chief, Misogyny Must End</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16111">2026-04-21</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_53_Out_of_200_The_Lying_Solicitor_of_Alex.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 53 Out of 200: The Lying Solicitor of Alex Graveley Left Brett Wilson LLP Only Days or Few Weeks After the Garrett Trial (Attended by Almost Their Entire Office/Team)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16129">2026-04-22</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_54_Out_of_200_Alex_Matt_Automate_Twin_Cas.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 54 Out of 200: Alex-Matt/Automate Twin Cases, Separated at Birth, Drafted by Brett Wilson LLP and 5RB</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16149">2026-04-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_55_Out_of_200_Strangled_Women_Charged_for.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 55 Out of 200: Strangled Women, Charged for Strangulation, Cannot Find a Job Now (After Microsoft)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16156">2026-04-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_56_Out_of_200_5RB_and_Brett_Wilson_LLP_s_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 56 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP&#8217;s Copy-Paste Machination for Garrett and Graveley</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16182">2026-04-25</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_57_Out_of_200_5RB_and_Brett_Wilson_LLP_Ma.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 57 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP Made the Garrett and Graveley Particulars of Claims a Lot Like Photocopies!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16196">2026-04-26</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_58_Out_of_200_5RB_and_Brett_Wilson_LLP_He.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 58 Out of 200: 5RB and Brett Wilson LLP Helped Garrett and Graveley Make Equivalent of GAFAM NDAs Superficially &#8216;Enforceable&#8217; in the UK, Using Threats</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16204">2026-04-27</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_59_Out_of_200_Mentioning_the_Fact_Alex_Gr.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 59 Out of 200: Mentioning the Fact Alex Graveley Arrested and Charged for Strangulation in Texas is &#8220;Reckless&#8221; and &#8220;Malicious&#8221;, According to His &#8216;Hired Guns&#8217; in London</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16217">2026-04-28</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_60_Out_of_200_Talking_About_Corruption_at.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 60 Out of 200: Talking About Corruption at Microsoft and Arrest for Strangulation is &#8220;Malice&#8221;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16246">2026-04-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_61_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Must_U.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 61 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Must Understand That Reporting Women&#8217;s Issues in the United States of America (“the US”) is Not Impermissible</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16265">2026-04-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/04/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_62_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_Issue_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 62 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley Issue Astounding Copy-Paste Masterpiece Asserting Publicly-Accessible Embarrassing Facts Must Remain Hidden</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16275">2026-05-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_63_Out_of_200_Graveley_as_a_Stripped_Down.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 63 Out of 200: Graveley as a Stripped-Down Version of Garrett in the Particulars of Claim (5RB Barrister Could Do This in One Minute)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16299">2026-05-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_64_Out_of_200_Not_Amused_by_Repeated_Thre.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 64 Out of 200: Not Amused by Repeated Threats (to &#8220;Shut Down&#8221; My &#8220;Existence&#8221; While Mentioning My Wife Too)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16317">2026-05-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_65_Out_of_200_Graveley_and_Garrett_Claims.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 65 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims Are Word-by-Word Similar (They Also Collaborated All Along)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16324">2026-05-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_66_Out_of_200_Alex_Graveley_Did_Illegal_T.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 66 Out of 200: Alex Graveley Did Illegal Things, Then Asserted Mentioning Those Illegal Things is Privacy Violation</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16341">2026-05-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_67_Out_of_200_Graveley_and_Garrett_Claims.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 67 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Claims Against My Wife and I Assert &#8216;Distress&#8217;, But It Was Just a Copy-Pasted Template (Mechanical Crocodile Tears)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16372">2026-05-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_68_Out_of_200_Based_on_Their_Particulars_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 68 Out of 200: Based on Their Particulars of Claims, Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett Seem Like the Same Person (Exactly Same Words Used, Sloppily Recycled)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16386">2026-05-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_69_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_Strang.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 69 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley Strangles, Gets Arrested, Charged, Then Asks for Apology From Those Who Reported It by Recycling Garrett&#8217;s Plea for Apology</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16407">2026-05-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_70_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_Injunc.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 70 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley Injunction Request 100% the Same as Garrett&#8217;s (Pure &#8216;Copy-paste&#8217;, Not Even a Word or Single Character Changed!)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16420">2026-05-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_71_Out_of_200_5RB_Barristers_Made_Tens_of.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 71 Out of 200: 5RB Barristers Made Tens of Thousands of Pounds by Changing From Plural to Singular for Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16430">2026-05-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_72_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_and_Ga.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 72 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett Signed Documents That Hold Them Accountable to Truth and Liable for Lies</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16447">2026-05-11</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_73_Out_of_200_Microsoft_s_Graveley_and_Ga.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 73 Out of 200: Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley and Garrett Remain Closely Connected in May 2026 (&#8220;Tag-Teaming&#8221; Against Bloggers in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16461">2026-05-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_74_Out_of_200_The_Basis_of_My_Lawsuit_Aga.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 74 Out of 200: The Basis of My Lawsuit Against Alex Graveley, Who Helps Garrett Stack the Docket in Another Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16482">2026-05-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_75_Out_of_200_All_True_All_Verifiable_Unl.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 75 Out of 200: All True, All Verifiable, Unlike Garrett and Graveley Lying to at Least Three High Court Judges About What They Did</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16509">2026-05-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_76_Out_of_200_The_Problem_With_the_United.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 76 Out of 200: The Problem With the United Kingdom Allowing Americans to File Lawsuits by Proxy (Relayed by &#8220;Hired Guns&#8221;)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16520">2026-05-15</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_77_Out_of_200_They_Never_Knew_How_to_Hand.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 77 Out of 200: They Never Knew How to Handle Women (Except to Attack Them)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16544">2026-05-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_78_Out_of_200_Slandering_Me_for_Saying_th.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 78 Out of 200: Slandering Me for Saying the Truth About Graveley and Garrett&#8217;s Abuse of Processes, Stacking Dockets</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16553">2026-05-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_79_Out_of_200_They_Will_Soon_Reach_the_10.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 79 Out of 200: They Will Soon Reach the 100 KG (Kilograms) Milestone; Wheelbarrows, Not Justice (Quantity of Legal Papers Sent to Us)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16567">2026-05-18</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_80_Out_of_200_Having_Run_Out_of_Time_to_M.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 80 Out of 200: Having Run Out of Time to Meet a Judge&#8217;s Deadline, Microsoft&#8217;s Graveley Had Garrett&#8217;s Lawyers Argued My ~190-Page Defence and CounterClaim (DCC) Was Unclear About My Position</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16583">2026-05-19</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_81_Out_of_200_SLAPP_Censorship_Does_Not_W.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 81 Out of 200: SLAPP Censorship Does Not Work If Your Sole Strategy is Revenge (and You Attack the Family)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16596">2026-05-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_82_Out_of_200_British_Government_Interven.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 82 Out of 200: British Government Intervenes in the SLAPPs by Brett Wilson LLP</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16606">2026-05-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_83_Out_of_200_Religion_is_Still_Alive_But.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 83 Out of 200: Religion is Still Alive, But for Many This Religion is Monetary (Greed, Monopolies, Corporate Power)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16627">2026-05-22</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_84_Out_of_200_New_Legislation_Against_SLA.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 84 Out of 200: New Legislation Against SLAPPs on the Way (After We Reached Out to Ministers)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16637">2026-05-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_85_Out_of_200_The_United_Kingdom_s_Rating.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 85 Out of 200: The United Kingdom&#8217;s Rating for Press Freedom Has Improved, But We Can Do Even Better</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16653">2026-05-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_86_Out_of_200_The_Position_of_Courts_on_C.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 86 Out of 200: The Position of Courts on Computer-Generated Lawsuits and Filings From Another Continent (Made by Two Men Who Work for Slop Companies)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16668">2026-05-25</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_87_Out_of_200_Access_to_Justice.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 87 Out of 200: Access to Justice</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16680">2026-05-26</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_88_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_is_Defamin.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 88 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP is Defaming Trans People in America Because Garrett Pays Hired Guns to Silence Them</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16705">2026-05-27</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_89_Out_of_200_SRA_Admits_Malfunction_That.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 89 Out of 200: SRA Admits Malfunction, That&#8217;s Why Transparency is Paramount</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16713">2026-05-28</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_90_Out_of_200_When_Efforts_to_Silence_His.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 90 Out of 200: When Efforts to Silence His Spouse and Also the Wife of a Blogger in Another Continent Only Give More Exposure to Embarrassing Information</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16739">2026-05-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_91_Out_of_200_Legal_Aid_in_Support_of_Fre.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 91 Out of 200: Legal Aid in Support of Freedom of the Press and British Women (Attacked by Americans)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16756">2026-05-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_92_Out_of_200_A_Spouse_Cannot_be_Turned_O.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 92 Out of 200: A Spouse Cannot be Turned &#8220;On&#8221; and &#8220;Off&#8221; Like a Faucet</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16767">2026-05-31</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/05/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_93_Out_of_200_A_Blueprint_of_Reckless_Law.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 93 Out of 200: A Blueprint of Reckless Lawfare in the UK, Waged and Funded by Americans (in Another Continent)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16781">2026-06-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_94_Out_of_200_SLAPP_by_Garrett_s_Litigati.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 94 Out of 200: SLAPP by Garrett&#8217;s Litigation Buddy Started 20 Months Ago, He Has Not Even Put in His Defence Yet!</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16796">2026-06-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_95_Out_of_200_The_Growing_Risk_of_Tolerat.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 95 Out of 200: The Growing Risk of Tolerating Men Who Abuse and Physically Assault Women</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16827">2026-06-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_96_Out_of_200_When_You_Receive_Death_Thre.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 96 Out of 200: When You Receive Death Threats From Anonymous Sockpuppets/Burner Accounts Connected to People Who Strangle Women and Tell Women to Kill Themselves</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16855">2026-06-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_97_Out_of_200_Garrett_in_Hiding_From_the_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 97 Out of 200: Garrett in Hiding (From the Simple Observable Fact He&#8217;s Closely Connected to the Microsofter Who Strangles Women, Tells Women to Kill Themselves, and Worse)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16874">2026-06-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_98_Out_of_200_Microsoft_Threatening_Real_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 98 Out of 200: Microsoft Threatening Real Security Researcher With Criminal Investigation for Talking About Microsoft&#8217;s Bug Doors/Back Doors</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16910">2026-06-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_99_Out_of_200_Graveley_and_Garrett_Seem_t.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 99 Out of 200: Graveley and Garrett Seem to Have Crashed Brett Wilson LLP (Worse Than Taking Russian Oligarchs as SLAPP Clients)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16928">2026-06-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_100_Out_of_200_Interlude_and_Outline_of_t.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 100 Out of 200: Interlude and Outline of the First Half, 3+ Months That Got Us Death Threats Connected to Brett Wilson LLP (and Cyber Attacks That Are Difficult to Attribute)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16946">2026-06-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_101_Out_of_200_Women_Come_to_Realise_They.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 101 Out of 200: Women Come to Realise They Don&#8217;t Wish to Participate in Attacking Vulnerable Women</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16963">2026-06-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_102_Out_of_200_Maybe_One_Day_Whistleblowe.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 102 Out of 200: Maybe One Day Whistleblowers From Brett Wilson LLP Will Tell Us What Really Happened</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="16973">2026-06-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_103_Out_of_200_Telling_People_What_They_K.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 103 Out of 200: Telling People What They Know and Don&#8217;t Know About Death Threats They Receive</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17002">2026-06-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_104_Out_of_200_Exactly_Two_Years_Ago_Bret.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 104 Out of 200: Exactly Two Years Ago Brett Wilson LLP Humiliated or Weaponised Our Solicitor&#8217;s Judaism in an Effort to Censor and Gag Us</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17009">2026-06-13</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_105_Out_of_200_When_Bad_Legal_Advice_Resu.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 105 Out of 200: When Bad Legal Advice Results in Your Client, Dale Vince, Ordered to Pay £600k &#8211; or 801,930 United States Dollar (USD) &#8211; to the Person Frivolously Sued (Lord Bailey of Paddington)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17021">2026-06-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_106_Out_of_200_100_Kilograms_of_Legal_Pap.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 106 Out of 200: 100 Kilograms of Legal Papers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17031">2026-06-15</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_107_Out_of_200_Keeping_Law_Accessible_to_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 107 Out of 200: Keeping Law Accessible to Everybody</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17065">2026-06-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_108_Out_of_200_Moving_On_and_Moving_Up.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 108 Out of 200: Moving On and Moving Up</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17087">2026-06-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_109_Out_of_200_When_You_Drag_Family_Membe.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 109 Out of 200: When You Drag Family Members Into a Case Unrelated to Them Because Their Relative Published Something</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17096">2026-06-18</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/18/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_110_Out_of_200_Anti_SLAPP_Reform_Formally.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 110 Out of 200: Anti-SLAPP Reform Formally Advanced in the United Kingdom (UK) the Same Week the Serial Strangler From Microsoft (US) Does Forum-Shopping in the UK</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17119">2026-06-19</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/19/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_111_Out_of_200_Garrett_and_Graveley_the_L.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 111 Out of 200: Garrett and Graveley (the Latter Arrested for Strangling Women) Keep Ousting Their Collaboration in Litigation, Lawfare in a Foreign Continent</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17134">2026-06-20</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/20/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_112_Out_of_200_Strangles_Women_Then_Refus.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 112 Out of 200: Strangles Women, Then Refuses to Even Attend Any of His Own Hearings About It</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17143">2026-06-21</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/21/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_113_Out_of_200_The_United_Kingdom_is_Not_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 113 Out of 200: The United Kingdom is Not Turkey</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17160">2026-06-22</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/22/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_114_Out_of_200_Thousands_Articles_to_Come.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 114 Out of 200: Thousands of Long Articles to Come, Properly Covering the SLAPP Industry in the UK and Its Modus Operandi</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17173">2026-06-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_115_Out_of_200_Spending_the_Next_Decade_W.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 115 Out of 200: Spending the Next Decade Writing About SLAPPs and Trying to Fix the System</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17182">2026-06-23</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/23/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_116_Out_of_200_5_Years_of_Multiparty_Lawf.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 116 Out of 200: 5 Years of Multiparty Lawfare Against Techrights, Funded by Americans and Also by Third Parties (Including Microsoft Salaries)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17198">2026-06-24</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/24/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_117_Out_of_200_Libel_Tourism_or_Defamatio.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 117 Out of 200: Libel Tourism or Defamation Forum-Shopping in the United Kingdom Condemned by the European Union (EU)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17213">2026-06-25</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/25/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_118_Out_of_200_Exposing_Crimes_is_Not_a_C.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 118 Out of 200: Exposing Crimes is Not a Crime, It is a Public Service</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17230">2026-06-26</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/26/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_119_Out_of_200_Our_Suggestions_to_Our_Pol.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 119 Out of 200: Our Suggestions to Our Politicians and Heads of State</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17277">2026-06-27</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/27/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_120_Out_of_200_Garrett_Undermines_His_Own.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 120 Out of 200: Garrett Undermines His Own Application Because His Friend Graveley Failed to Accomplish What They Had Both Aimed For</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17287">2026-06-28</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/28/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_121_Out_of_200_One_Day_We_ll_Discover_Wha.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 121 Out of 200: One Day We&#8217;ll Discover What Company or Rich Person/s Funded the Lawfare Against Us</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17322">2026-06-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_122_Out_of_200_Garrett_s_Solicitors_Confi.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 122 Out of 200: Garrett&#8217;s Solicitors Confirm That Garrett is Ban-Evading and Spying on Our IRC Network</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17337">2026-06-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/06/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_123_Out_of_200_Why_Violence_Against_Anima.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 123 Out of 200: Why Violence Against Animals Matters</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17369">2026-07-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_124_Out_of_200_The_Court_Deems_My_Wife_Co.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 124 Out of 200: The Court Deems My Wife Connected to the Case of the Serial Strangler From Microsoft, Invites Her to the Hearing Last Week</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17397">2026-07-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_125_Out_of_200_Litigants_in_Person_LIPs_H.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 125 Out of 200: Litigants in Person (LIPs) Handling American Lawfare Funded by Third Parties (About a Million Pounds for 100 Kilograms of Legal Papers)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17415">2026-07-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_126_Out_of_200_Becoming_More_Aggressive_A.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 126 Out of 200: Becoming More Aggressive Against Us Only Proves Us Right</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17445">2026-07-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_127_Out_of_200_Lawsuits_by_Americans_File.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 127 Out of 200: Lawsuits by Americans Filed in the UK a Burden on British Taxpayers, No Way to Recover the Funds When Americans Lose Their Cases</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17473">2026-07-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_128_Out_of_200_Making_Laws_Work_for_Brita.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 128 Out of 200: Making Laws Work for Britain, Not Oversensitive Americans Looking for &#8216;Revenge&#8217; by Lawfare</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17497">2026-07-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_129_Out_of_200_Iranian_Tactics.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 129 Out of 200: Iranian Tactics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17518">2026-07-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_130_Out_of_200_Jealousy_Envy_Hubris.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 130 Out of 200: Jealousy, Envy, Hubris</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17526">2026-07-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_131_Out_of_200_A_Big_Win_for_the_Media_in.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 131 Out of 200: A Big Win for the Media in the United Kingdom (UK) Today</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17531">2026-07-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_132_Out_of_200_When_You_Cannot_Pay_a_Mill.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 132 Out of 200: When You Cannot Pay a Million Pounds (1,335,520.00 United States Dollar) to Lawyers But Have a Strong Community</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="17973">2026-07-29</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/29/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_133_Out_of_200_Lies_by_Omission.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 133 Out of 200: Lies by Omission</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18002">2026-07-30</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/30/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_134_Out_of_200_What_Majority_Rules_Tell_U.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 134 Out of 200: What &#8220;Majority Rules&#8221; Tell Us About the Litigant</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18024">2026-07-31</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/07/31/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_135_Out_of_200_Limited_Liability_Partners.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 135 Out of 200: Limited Liability Partnership (LLP) That Does Not Disclose Financial Activities Before August</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18033">2026-08-01</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/01/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_136_Out_of_200_Lawyers_That_Get_Paid_to_M.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 136 Out of 200: Lawyers That Get Paid to Mess About</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18057">2026-08-02</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/02/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_137_Out_of_200_Discovering_That_Spending_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 137 Out of 200: Discovering That Spending a Million British Pounds (1,348,250.01 United States Dollars) on Lawyers Cannot Take Down One&#8217;s Critics</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18095">2026-08-03</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/03/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_138_Out_of_200_Garrett_Has_Basically_Lost.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 138 Out of 200: Garrett Has Basically &#8220;Lost&#8221; and It is &#8220;Embarrassing&#8221; to Them</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18118">2026-08-04</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/04/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_139_Out_of_200_Solicitors_Regulation_Auth.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 139 Out of 200: Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) Needs More Public Scrutiny (New Management Changed Nothing, It&#8217;s Costing a Lot of Taxpayers&#8217; Money)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18150">2026-08-05</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/05/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_140_Out_of_200_You_Become_What_You_Eat_Yo.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 140 Out of 200: You Become What You Eat, Your Clients Become You</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18159">2026-08-06</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/06/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_141_Out_of_200_Brett_Wilson_LLP_Failed_to.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 141 Out of 200: Brett Wilson LLP Failed to Learn From the Mistakes of the European Patent Office (EPO)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18192">2026-08-07</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/07/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_142_Out_of_200_GemText_is_Not_a_Webpage_G.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 142 Out of 200: GemText is Not a Webpage, Gemini Protocol is Not the Web, and Capsules Are Not Websites</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18211">2026-08-08</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/08/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_143_Out_of_200_After_Nearly_10_Attempts_t.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 143 Out of 200: After Nearly 10 Attempts to Settle With Us and Over a Million Pounds Spent on Lawyers and Barristers</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18227">2026-08-09</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/09/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_144_Out_of_200_The_Hired_Guns_Media_at_BW.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 144 Out of 200: The &#8220;Hired Guns&#8221; (&#8220;Media&#8221; at BW) Shrank Almost Three-Fold Since They Sued Us in 2024</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18238">2026-08-10</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/10/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_145_Out_of_200_They_Tried_Hard_to_Hide_th.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 145 Out of 200: They Tried Hard to Hide the Fact Their Client Had Been Sued, Twice Even</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18267">2026-08-11</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/11/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_146_Out_of_200_An_Industry_of_Plagiarism_.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 146 Out of 200: An Industry of Plagiarism, &#8216;Normalised&#8217;</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18287">2026-08-12</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/12/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_148_Out_of_200_The_SLAPP_Series_is_Slow_B.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 147 Out of 200: The SLAPP Series is &#8216;Slow&#8217; Because Timing Matters</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18317">2026-08-13</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/13/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_148_Out_of_200_The_Manosphere.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 148 Out of 200: The Manosphere</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18333">2026-08-14</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/14/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_149_Out_of_200_It_Took_a_Long_Time_to_Sho.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 149 Out of 200: It Took a Long Time to Show What Jason Arday (at Cambridge) and Harvey Weinstein (in Hollywood) Really Were</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18352">2026-08-15</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/15/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_150_Out_of_200_Always_Independently_Verif.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 150 Out of 200: Always Independently Verify What People Claim to Be (or Find Yourself in a Jason Arday-Type Moment/Dilemma)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18370">2026-08-16</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/16/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_151_Out_of_200_Dealing_With_Sleazy_People.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 151 Out of 200: Dealing With Sleazy People and Companies That Steal (While Employing These Sleazy People)</a></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td id="18385">2026-08-17</td>
<td><a href="http://techrights.org/n/2026/08/17/SLAPP_Censorship_Part_152_Out_of_200_Injunctions_Do_Not_Cover_C.shtml">SLAPP Censorship &#8211; Part 152 Out of 200: Injunctions Do Not Cover Criticism, They Have Scope</a></td>
</tr>
</table>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/ifab-brett-wilson-llp/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gemini Protocol Spreads Further in Spite of Google&#8217;s Attempt to Googlebomb It Out of Existence</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/gemini-protocol-spreads/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/gemini-protocol-spreads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:58:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8934</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[O almost 3 years ago Google hijacked the term &#8220;Gemini&#8221; (in relation to Web/Net stuff), which makes it hard to find information online about Gemini Protocol, pretending Google&#8217;s slop brand by 4 years! Despite the attack on the &#8220;brand&#8221;, i.e. on Gemini Protocol, Geminispace continued to grow. What next can GAFAM do to derail alternatives?]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/gem-3510.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/gem-3510.png" alt="There are 5238 capsules. We successfully connected recently to 3510 of them." width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8935" /></a></p>
<p><img title="S" src="/IMG/Caps/s.png" alt="S" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />O almost 3 years ago <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2023/12/12/hijacking-gemini/">Google hijacked the term &#8220;Gemini&#8221; (in relation to Web/Net stuff)</a>, which makes it hard to find information online about Gemini Protocol, pretending Google&#8217;s slop brand by 4 years!</p>
<p>Despite the attack on the &#8220;brand&#8221;, i.e. on Gemini <b>Protocol</b>, Geminispace continued to grow.</p>
<p>What next can GAFAM do to derail alternatives?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/gemini-protocol-spreads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paul Robeson Used His Fame (and Voice) for Good, Not for Money</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/paul-robeson-used-his-fame-and-voice-for-good-not-for-money/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/paul-robeson-used-his-fame-and-voice-for-good-not-for-money/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 19:25:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Philosophy]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8926</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Society must look up to people like him, not greedy people who hoard money and power, not &#8220;pay it forward&#8221; to those in dire need (of a voice, not necessarily money) &#8216;ve long respected Paul Robeson (for decades already) not just for his excellent, strong voice and learning of new languages, which he then used [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><em>Society must look up to people like him, not greedy people who hoard money and power, not &#8220;pay it forward&#8221; to those in dire need (of a voice, not necessarily money)</em></p>
<p><a href="https://inv.nadeko.net/embed/nxZs96ByLlg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/robeson-song.png" alt="I Still Suits Me (Remastered)" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8927" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />&#8216;ve long respected Paul Robeson (for <em>decades</em> already) not just for his excellent, <a href="https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=eh9WayN7R-s">strong voice</a> and <a href="https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=wJv0jMLLRcw">learning of new languages</a>, which he then used to communicate internationally (this reminded me of RMS). In the face of controversy and risk (the US tried to ostracise and sanction him) <a href="https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=B0bezsMVU7c&#038;listen=false">he persisted in his activism</a>, using his good name and reputation to do something risky without monetary gain/rewards.</p>
<p>A recently-deceased French model did the same for animals. She died as controversial because she opposed the same &#8220;Establishment&#8221; that had helped her rise to fame.</p>
<p>Don&#8217;t rise to power. Fight <b>unjust power</b>.</p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/coal-robeson.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/coal-robeson.png" alt="Paul Robeson sings to Scottish miners (1949)" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8928" /></a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/paul-robeson-used-his-fame-and-voice-for-good-not-for-money/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Anniversary a Month From Now</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/anniversary-a-month-from-now/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/anniversary-a-month-from-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 17:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8923</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[T was &#8220;15 years ago when I first met Rianne,&#8221; I said earlier this year. &#8220;It was at a birthday party of a friend of hers and a friend of mine. We started chatting randomly and soon figured out we had a lot in common, including our Computer Science background.&#8221; A month from now we [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/rose-flower-wallpaper-free_1024x768_83151e.jpg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/rose-flower-wallpaper-free_1024x768_83151e.jpg" alt="Rianne Schestowtz" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8924" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />T was &#8220;15 years ago when I first met Rianne,&#8221; I said <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/02/12/my-lovely-valentine/">earlier this year</a>. &#8220;It was at a birthday party of a friend of hers and a friend of mine. We started chatting randomly and soon figured out we had a lot in common, including our Computer Science background.&#8221;</p>
<p>A month from now we have our wedding anniversary (Sept. 18<sup>th</sup>) and exactly a week from now Rianne celebrates her birthday. Today I asked her what balloon colours she wanted. She said purple. So I got that!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s nice that Rianne&#8217;s birthdays always happen during holidays/vacations, but jealous snakes fancy <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/08/in-2025-brett-wilson-llp-breached-rules-pertaining-to-respecting-holidays/">trying to spoil these in recent years</a>. Let&#8217;s see if they will try the same again this year.</p>
<p><a href="https://techrights.org/n/2026/08/11/Not_Allowing_Misogyny_and_Misogynists_to_Run_the_World.shtml">Misogynists</a> generally can&#8217;t help it. Nothing infuriates them more than seeing people who are 1) happy and 2) in love.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/anniversary-a-month-from-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Need Rain, Need Lots of Rain</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/need-rain-need-lots-of-rain/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/need-rain-need-lots-of-rain/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 16:43:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Environment]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8920</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This time for real? T seems like we&#8217;re getting only drizzles lately, no heavy rains. It&#8217;s worrying because the birds are literally banging their body&#8217;s against my doors for attention, they desperately want food. Today we fed several flocks in our way to and back from Town. They were &#8220;happy clappy&#8221; about it (we clap [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This time <strong>for real</strong>?</p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/manc-rain.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/manc-rain.png" alt="Manchester rain" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8921" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />T seems like we&#8217;re getting only drizzles lately, no heavy rains. It&#8217;s worrying because the birds are literally banging their body&#8217;s against my doors for attention, they desperately want food. Today we fed several flocks in our way to and back from Town. They were &#8220;happy clappy&#8221; about it (we clap to get their attention).</p>
<p>Seeing the yellow &#8216;grass&#8217; (if that can even be called &#8220;grass&#8221; at this point; it seems dead everywhere, many bushes and plants too, maybe not trees) is profoundly saddening. If it becomes this bad every year, and if all we have to show for it is chatbots (pyramid scheme basically) and <a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/06/map-of-data-centres-in-greater-manchester/">useless data centres</a>, then our species is doomed already.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/need-rain-need-lots-of-rain/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Update on the Tor Situation</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/update-on-the-tor-situation/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/update-on-the-tor-situation/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 14:19:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[became aware that this domain was no longer accessible over Tor. I do not use Tor myself, but this site targets technical people, some of whom are Tor users. I did my best to first affirm that there was a block on Tor; there was then a discussion on feasibility of undoing this. Tor in [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> became aware that this domain was no longer accessible over Tor.</p>
<p>I do not use Tor myself, but this site targets technical people, some of whom are Tor users.</p>
<p>I did my best to first affirm that there was a block on Tor; there was then a discussion on feasibility of undoing this.</p>
<p>Tor in schestowitz.com and www.schestowitz.com remains blocked not because of my personal choice; it&#8217;s a decision further up the chain.</p>
<p>Sorry.</p>
<p>This may impact some whistleblowers who wish to speak to me about corruption and report misconduct.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/update-on-the-tor-situation/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>This Past Weekend Cloudflare Measured GNU/Linux at 10% (at Peak)</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/this-past-weekend-cloudflare-measured-gnulinux-at-10-at-peak/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/this-past-weekend-cloudflare-measured-gnulinux-at-10-at-peak/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 07:57:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8913</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Orange = share of GNU/Linux. spent a lot of time this morning looking through Cloudflare Radar to better understand OS trends worldwide. Weekends are when most people do not work. This past weekend GNU/Linux was measured at over 8% but peaked at about 10%. Cloudflare has vast data and given the scale of it all, [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Orange = share of GNU/Linux.</p>
<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/weekend-clownflare.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/weekend-clownflare.png" alt="Weekend Clownflare" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8914" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> spent a lot of time this morning looking through Cloudflare Radar to better understand OS trends worldwide.</p>
<p>Weekends are when most people do not work. This past weekend GNU/Linux was measured at over 8% but peaked at about 10%.</p>
<p>Cloudflare has vast data and given the scale of it all, it&#8217;s hard to dismiss as mere noise.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/this-past-weekend-cloudflare-measured-gnulinux-at-10-at-peak/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Offline More</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/offline-more/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/offline-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2026 05:13:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Personal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8910</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[EXT week it is Rianne&#8217;s birthday and we plan to celebrate somewhere nearby. Technically we&#8217;re still on holiday for 15 days to come and we&#8217;re enjoying every moment of it. We spend more time offline and go to the park to feed many birds amid a worrying drought. We predict that later this week some [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Tenton.jpg"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Tenton.jpg" alt="Tenton" width="520" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8911" /></a></p>
<p><img title="N" src="/IMG/Caps/n.png" alt="N" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" />EXT week it is Rianne&#8217;s birthday and we plan to celebrate somewhere nearby. Technically we&#8217;re still on holiday for 15 days to come and we&#8217;re enjoying every moment of it. We spend more time offline and go to the park to feed many birds amid a worrying drought.</p>
<p>We predict that later this week some thugs in London will try to bully us again; it would be a giant own goal if they attempted to do so.</p>
<p>Yesterday I discussed with a friend how Web search is getting worse over time, maybe by intention (intent would be difficult to prove though).</p>
<p>Is there any in &#8220;Tech&#8221; that is actually still improving?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/17/offline-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>&#8220;Trip Hop&#8221; is a Thing Now?</title>
		<link>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/16/trip-hop-is-a-thing-now/</link>
		<comments>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/16/trip-hop-is-a-thing-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 16 Aug 2026 17:39:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Roy Schestowitz]]></dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Music]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/?p=8906</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[recognise that Joji in performing in Manchester tonight and my neighbour knows him. I had never heard of him until he was listed here and I checked his weird style. I didn&#8217;t know a thing like &#8220;Trip Hop&#8221; even existed. Today&#8217;s music has become so strange. Who chooses winners and losers? How? Simple and bland [&#8230;]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Joji_Performing_Live_in_2018_cropped_better_quality.png"><img src="https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/wp-content/uploads/2026/08/Joji_Performing_Live_in_2018_cropped_better_quality.png" alt="Joji" width="197" height="272" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-8907" /></a></p>
<p><img title="I" src="/IMG/Caps/i.png" alt="I" align="left" border="0" hspace="0" vspace="4" /> recognise that <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Joji_(musician)">Joji</a> in performing <a href="https://www.cooplive.com/events/joji-rzp7">in Manchester tonight</a> and my neighbour knows him. I had never heard of him until he was listed here and I checked his <a href="https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=iK_I2jW5gOQ">weird style</a>. I didn&#8217;t know a thing like &#8220;Trip Hop&#8221; even existed.</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s music has become so strange. Who chooses winners and losers? How?</p>
<p>Simple and bland music is a shoddy form of art.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>https://schestowitz.com/Weblog/archives/2026/08/16/trip-hop-is-a-thing-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
