Schestowitz.com Home

Home Messages Index
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index

Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation

  • Subject: Re: God=G_uv proves 40k B.C. Creation
  • From: Roy Schestowitz <newsgroups@schestowitz.com>
  • Date: Thu, 07 Oct 2004 15:51:06 +0100
  • Followup-to: sci.physics.relativity
  • Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity, talk.origins, alt.talk.creationism
  • References: <%t3Zc.213728$8_6.141480@attbi_s04> <a6mdnQxbPvCCadfcRVn-qw@comcast.com> <2b68957a.0409180445.117180a9@posting.google.com> <IqWdnVF4A9JHkNDcRVn-jQ@comcast.com> <cik793$k5d$07$1@news.t-online.com> <lvOdna7i37LE5dPcRVn-uw@comcast.com> <cinmra$27i$01$1@news.t-online.com> <NKSdnfAMD_IrU9LcRVn-tg@comcast.com> <2b68957a.0409210222.354dc16f@posting.google.com> <BtednVwVG9_Xzc3cRVn-iQ@comcast.com> <2b68957a.0409290742.2da8b402@posting.google.com> <FY-dnSF6DZiayMbcRVn-sw@comcast.com> <cjhc9e$ihn$04$2@news.t-online.com> <pZ-dnRqJCu720MHcRVn-jg@comcast.com> <cjhpu0$8am$04$1@news.t-online.com> <SpidnXmS6NPid8HcRVn-uQ@comcast.com> <timberwoof-9677FA.11260501102004@typhoon.sonic.net> <ZYGdnQJxEK6VtsPcRVn-sg@comcast.com> <4K6dnUkwAIq-qcPcRVn-tA@comcast.com> <10lsjapebp7htc9@corp.supernews.com> <CbmdncJiVJPh4cLcRVn-sQ@comcast.com> <cjo23s$1ijq$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk> <eI-dndz9J_rPoPzcRVn-gg@comcast.com> <cjrgq8$4h1$1@godfrey.mcc.ac.uk> <mY2dnX5jWfIc3f7cRVn-uQ@comcast.com>
  • User-agent: KNode/0.7.2
George Hammond wrote:

>> So you in fact used to be an atheist before changing your mind. Swinging
>> back and forth like that wounds your credibility.
> 
> [Hammond]
> Didn't seem to wound St. Paul's credibility.

Okay, everyone! GEORGE HAMMAND ADMITS BEING AN ATHEIST IN THE PAST. Draw the
right conclusions if you will...

>> > there *IS* a flaw in "Darwinian Evolution".... namely, there is a
>> > "Divine Selection" term that is missing in his theory.  SPoG proves
>> > this.  Christ!......... Darwin is actually WRONG!
>>
>> No. That's a term you added. It's almost like shoving words in someone's
>> month and then attacking him/her.
> 
> [Hammond]
> Hey.. your just giving us your loudmouth unsupported
> OPINION.... nobody is interested in opinions here,

Your reply suggests you are not able to give a proper answer.

> least of all yours.  I've published a proof in the peer reviewed
> literature and it's posted on my website.

It doesn't mean anything. Stop saying 'peer-reviewed' and 'my website'. It
won't impress anybody.

>> > [Hammond]
>> > Nice to hear from you Roy.
>>
>> Sure you like the attention.
> 
> [Hammond]
> No, I enjory hearing bigshots like you squeal when I step
> on their toes with a scientific proof of God.

Let me clarify something: the only reason these George Hammand threads go on
and on is that people are tired of the s*** that comes up in sophisticated
newsgroups. If you had not replied to any single message, your name would
have  faded by now, AND YOU KNOW IT.

Again I say what I said to you before: real scientists know how to use a
spell checker.

-- 
Roy Schestowitz
http://schestowitz.com

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Author IndexDate IndexThread Index