George Hammond wrote:
>> So you in fact used to be an atheist before changing your mind. Swinging
>> back and forth like that wounds your credibility.
>
> [Hammond]
> Didn't seem to wound St. Paul's credibility.
Okay, everyone! GEORGE HAMMAND ADMITS BEING AN ATHEIST IN THE PAST. Draw the
right conclusions if you will...
>> > there IS a flaw in "Darwinian Evolution".... namely, there is a
>> > "Divine Selection" term that is missing in his theory. SPoG proves
>> > this. Christ!......... Darwin is actually WRONG!
>>
>> No. That's a term you added. It's almost like shoving words in someone's
>> month and then attacking him/her.
>
> [Hammond]
> Hey.. your just giving us your loudmouth unsupported
> OPINION.... nobody is interested in opinions here,
Your reply suggests you are not able to give a proper answer.
> least of all yours. I've published a proof in the peer reviewed
> literature and it's posted on my website.
It doesn't mean anything. Stop saying 'peer-reviewed' and 'my website'. It
won't impress anybody.
--
Roy Schestowitz
http://schestowitz.com
>> > [Hammond]
>> > Nice to hear from you Roy.
>>
>> Sure you like the attention.
>
> [Hammond]
> No, I enjory hearing bigshots like you squeal when I step
> on their toes with a scientific proof of God.
Let me clarify something: the only reason these George Hammand threads go on
and on is that people are tired of the bollocks that comes up in
sophisticated
newsgroups. If you had not replied to any single message, your name would
have faded by now, AND YOU KNOW IT.
Again I say what I said to you before: real scientists know how to use a
spell checker.
--
Roy Schestowitz
http://schestowitz.co
|
